He lost the most time in the downhill also in the 2nd TT. So him not doing extensive recons this year either seems like a genius decision.The last ITT was a bit of a red flag though. He lost time between every timestop except the last one. While in the first ITT he only lost time during the downhill section.
Then what is even the point of his argument? IIRC he has made similar claims before regarding this topic. It sure looks like he is saying that Evenepoel would not have been performing better had he had a better preperation (without crashing, without rehab, without sudden weight increase (due to not training) and crash course weight drop between Dauphiné and TDF, while simply continuing the planned training/preparation). If he means Evenepoel might not have been able to get a better result (2nd or 1st) then i don't think anybody has made that claim, other than "we don't know how much better he might have been".I do think Rick meant not just absolute numbers (which vary due to other things we cant mention) but his relative performance vs the rest of the competition which was dominant and quite consistent. I think he can get better but there was never a stage when I thought: "he lost minutes here due to shallow base"
Last edited: