Like a semi-classic, but Evenepoel loves championships and wants that extra stimuli from a race so he should go for it.Nationals aren't important. There's more tradition in Belgium, but once they've won once or twice, it's not that important.
Like a semi-classic, but Evenepoel loves championships and wants that extra stimuli from a race so he should go for it.Nationals aren't important. There's more tradition in Belgium, but once they've won once or twice, it's not that important.
That's wikipedia, that's not an official source in any way, a website managed by volunteers. The official UCI website has the season's overview on their website, where obviously stages are part of the WT overview.2025 UCI World Tour - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It’s not what I said you said - it’s what I’m saying it’s analogous to. It’s my opinion and not a representation of your stance…And that is not remotely what I said. Please do not misrepresent me.
I should have used “level” or “status” instead of “stage”.Not unless Dwars door Vlaanderen is a stage race? Only counting overall GC wins or 1 day race wins is ridiculous. Either discuss stage race GCs or classics, and then it's a fair point. But excluding stages in WT races is simply idiotic if the point is to discuss WT races in general.
Sorry, it's ok. Jmdirt already replied and it was intended as you assumed.I should have used “level” or “status” instead of “stage”.
For a BelgianLike a semi-classic, but Evenepoel loves championships and wants that extra stimuli from a race so he should go for it.
Is it really necessary to tell me what wiki is? No its not.That's wikipedia, that's not an official source in any way, a website managed by volunteers. The official UCI website has the season's overview on their website, where obviously stages are part of the WT overview.
I'm not sure why you are making a big deal out of this. You said there where no Belgian WT winners in 2025, in the topic of a rider who won 2 by himself. You were corrected and instead of saying you made a mistake, you used wikipedia as a source and hid behind "silly UCI rules", while UCI most certainly has WT stages count as WT wins.Is it really necessary to tell me what wiki is? No its not.
Are you saying that the wiki chart is not correct?
The UCI chart is so great that you linked right?
The wiki graph gives a quick glance at results, the UCI site does not.
I admittedly have a bad memory so after I posted that a Belgian hadn't won a WT race yet this year, I thought that I should check my memory. I went to the UCI first, but you have to click on each race, then final result, and then back out to the next race and so on. With stage races you have two more clicks if you want to see each stage result. One click or 200+ clicks, you choose.
To help you sleep better though, I will go delete my previous posts about this.
EDIT: Next time that someone asks you who won (pick the stage race you want) the TdF, I want you to list each stage winner not the GC winner.
I'll reply to myself here: maybe the 'Every gram counts:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zT6Sa3qMijw
I remember an ex pro turned performance guru talking about the importance of light pedals and shoes since they are constantly in motion.
Read the post then reply...I'm not sure why you are making a big deal out of this. You said there where no Belgian WT winners in 2025, in the topic of a rider who won 2 by himself. You were corrected and instead of saying you made a mistake, you used wikipedia as a source and hid behind "silly UCI rules", while UCI most certainly has WT stages count as WT wins.
Sure doesn't seem like a week before the Tour he should be losing to a 40k Tim Wellens solo. I didn't see the race so maybe I'm missing something but for a rider ostensibly shooting for a TDF podium not sure how this could be spun as anything but an unhealthy sign, especially after a lackluster Dauphine.Shouldn't Remco have won the national easily, or was it wrong racing it?
Can he find better legs for the Tour?
I'm not particularly a Remco fan but in this case: yeah, you're missing something.Sure doesn't seem like a week before the Tour he should be losing to a 40k Tim Wellens solo. I didn't see the race so maybe I'm missing something but for a rider ostensibly shooting for a TDF podium not sure how this could be spun as anything but an unhealthy sign, especially after a lackluster Dauphine.
Well, then enligthen people who didn't watch the race. What happened?I'm not particularly a Remco fan but in this case: yeah, you're missing something.
Well, then enligthen people who didn't watch the race. What happened?
Wellens didn't beat Remco in a 40km time trial. Did you see the race to say that?
Philipsen conditioned Remco too much.
Aside from the fact that Remco spent the previous kilometers pulling the group. And he crashed before.
By the way, Wellens had a little help from the moto
Don't just have to look at the result or final kilometers to interpret a race.
You're trying to bait the wrong guy here 😄Multiple excuses
There's an article which seems to cover it on the main site...Well, then enligthen people who didn't watch the race. What happened?
Finally, as the riders were tiring, Wellens attacked at just the right moment with 41km to go, and when Evenepoel didn't immediately react, the UAE rider had the momentum to go solo, and he would not be caught again. The gap was never huge, but the chasing group disintegrated – partly thanks to Vermeersch's interference for his teammate – instead of working together, allowing Wellens to solo to the win.
He didn't 'peak' for this race.Sure doesn't seem like a week before the Tour he should be losing to a 40k Tim Wellens solo. I didn't see the race so maybe I'm missing something but for a rider ostensibly shooting for a TDF podium not sure how this could be spun as anything but an unhealthy sign, especially after a lackluster Dauphine.
He even doesn’t expect to peak until the 2nd week of the TDFHe didn't 'peak' for this race.
That he couldn't or wouldn't close could be several things other than an 'unhealthy' sign.