It makes sense and completely normal to have discussion regarding him aswell dont get me wrong you missing my point and perception and the meaning behind my question.
Thanks, I think I do understand your point, maybe not the meaning behind it.
As for my part I dont agree I simply dont get why he is constantly put next to Pogacar as a focal point when thats not realistic, my part was more a question in relation to posts i constanly read everytime im here,than anything else, and the reason I asked, also because I admit my view might be skewed or wrong since I’m not here very often., see where im coming from and my view? hence the question
I'm not sure I see it as constant, and I'm in the thread quite a bit, so I question that premise. Subjective of course, YMMV.
Maybe it seems a bit that you come here to re-iterate over and over that he's not close to Pogacar. Seems like you really, really want to make that point. Fair, and also fair to say maybe he will be some day. We've certainly seen our share of transformations or surprising improvement in many riders over the years, not the least of whom is our friend Tadej. So why not Remco? He's closer that most, and he's the goal, so again I don't see why he wouldn't be the focal point of many comparisons.
To me, it seems like every time I am here, Pogacar is constantly positioned as the focal point in relation to Remco, in the sense he is the only guy he needs to overcome, when he in fact he isnt the closest rival to Remco even, get my point? More as in theres far more/reasonable better focal points to focus on as well. It was a sincere question.
I don't really see that, I think a lot of people just don't find Vingegaard very interesting to talk about. Maybe I'm projecting. He's boring personally. He really only rides GT's. He's conservative on the bike in many ways. Tadej is cool AF and attacks all the time, riding everything from Roubaix to the TdF. He's tons more interesting, and he's the best. So of course he's the focal point.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram