Re: Re:
I'm sorry, but ofcourse it's true. He only rode a few days as a pro yet, so obviously the only thing we can compare, are his junior results. And nobody even comes rem(c)otely close. Better TT's? I'm pretty sure that if he was able to ride the WC with the same gear as Bjerg, who is 15 months older, that he would have come very close to beating Bjerg's time at the WC ITT in Innsbruck. And where was Bjerg during the RR? How many RR did he win in the juniors category? How many times did he -being the supreme ITT specialist he is- lap the peloton? How many stage races did Bjerg win?
Costa was about to turn 19 later in the month, when he battled the Tour of Utah, against the weakest field imaginable, and lost against... Lachlan Morton. You can pick out a few outliers for these guys, none of them has dominated his peers like Evenepoel.
You'll find 18-19 year olds who are better at sprinting, who occasionally stood out uphill, who can do a hard ITT and rival the big guys on a good day. But you will not find any rider that has been so consistent and dominant in one day races, stage races (he won ALL of those he entered), uphill and in ITT's as Remco.
I'll also add, that Remco's style of riding, will make it harder for him to win a lot at an early age as a pro, unless maybe an ITT in a weaker field, because he lacks punch. He's a tempoclimber, and for his age (just compare him to Sivakov) ahead of the curve. But obviously he will not outpace top riders that are 10 years older any time soon. Vacek, who was overshadowed by Remco in the juniors ranks, is a much punchier rider, and will likely win more stages than Remco early on as a pro.
Vroome.exe said:That is simply not true. He has done nothing so far as a pro, there have been a lot of better time trialists and climbers at 19 years of age even in a past few seasons. Adrien Costa, being 18 years old, almost won an HC stage race a few years ago. Mikkel Bjerg was also destroying others in TTs. Remco has only won against juniors and finishing a minute behind out of form riders on an easy climb is not something spectacular.
I'm sorry, but ofcourse it's true. He only rode a few days as a pro yet, so obviously the only thing we can compare, are his junior results. And nobody even comes rem(c)otely close. Better TT's? I'm pretty sure that if he was able to ride the WC with the same gear as Bjerg, who is 15 months older, that he would have come very close to beating Bjerg's time at the WC ITT in Innsbruck. And where was Bjerg during the RR? How many RR did he win in the juniors category? How many times did he -being the supreme ITT specialist he is- lap the peloton? How many stage races did Bjerg win?
Costa was about to turn 19 later in the month, when he battled the Tour of Utah, against the weakest field imaginable, and lost against... Lachlan Morton. You can pick out a few outliers for these guys, none of them has dominated his peers like Evenepoel.
You'll find 18-19 year olds who are better at sprinting, who occasionally stood out uphill, who can do a hard ITT and rival the big guys on a good day. But you will not find any rider that has been so consistent and dominant in one day races, stage races (he won ALL of those he entered), uphill and in ITT's as Remco.
I'll also add, that Remco's style of riding, will make it harder for him to win a lot at an early age as a pro, unless maybe an ITT in a weaker field, because he lacks punch. He's a tempoclimber, and for his age (just compare him to Sivakov) ahead of the curve. But obviously he will not outpace top riders that are 10 years older any time soon. Vacek, who was overshadowed by Remco in the juniors ranks, is a much punchier rider, and will likely win more stages than Remco early on as a pro.