Red Rick
BANNED
Olympics are big man. Riders base their schedule during an Olympic season heavily around the Olympics. Much more so than for monuments.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Olympics are big man. Riders base their schedule during an Olympic season heavily around the Olympics. Much more so than for monuments.
My ranking of the importance
- TDF
- Giro/Vuelta
- WCRR, OlyRR
- MSR, RVV, PR, LBL, Lombardia, PN, TA, Dauphine, TDS
- WCTT, OlyTT
- All other world tour races
Your positioning of MSR is sacrelige, however, as it goes after PR, LBL, Ronde, (Lombardia?). I know, the course is easy, but the time of the year and the capi make it magical. And I'd put Itzulia after PN and TDS, with San Sebastian and Strade (bless it's soul) at the bottom, but only for historical reasons. Worlds depends on the course and who wins, if not terribly hard and won by an outsider, then after Giro and Vuelta. If epic and won by a champion then where you put it.I actually consider the Olympics almost meaningless in a cyclist palmares. It has none of the cycling tradition of the monuments or Worlds. Especially since it used to be the territory only of “amateur” riders. It’s also this oddity the happens every four years and where cycling is only a small piece in the entire event.
I am aware that cyclists do target it and find it important. As a fan, I do not hold it high in a cycling palmares.
TDF
Worlds
Giro
Vuelta
P-R, LBL, Ronde, Lombardia
Strade, San Sebastián
MSR
Dauphine
TDS
Itzulia
Paris-Nice, T-A
My 2 cents.
They are not.One-week races are not equal to monuments, wut?
I'm even surprised people put Giro/Vuelta above some monuments. I would prefer to win de Ronde or Roubaix compared to a VueltaThey are not.
Ah, well, depends on your nationality and history I suppose. I mean, how can you choose between pavé, Belgian beer and sterate, the Dolomiti and Brunello? It's impossibile! Although, out of respect, the Italians call the Ronde and classics racing in Belgium generally the "university of cycling."I'm even surprised people put Giro/Vuelta above some monuments. I would prefer to win de Ronde or Roubaix compared to a Vuelta
The flip side of this is that Strade is very overrated here. It's a great race, but it doesn't have the prestige some want it to have.Olympics are big man. Riders base their schedule during an Olympic season heavily around the Olympics. Much more so than for monuments.
The flip side of this is that Strade is very overrated here. It's a great race, but it doesn't have the prestige some want it to have.
Well, it's not.
I don't think it's overrated, in the sense that it doesn't go before monuments, but it has rapidly since its recent inception effectively become the latest classic. I think it's beauty and challenges warrant such an honor, I would only lengthen it to 250 km.The flip side of this is that Strade is very overrated here. It's a great race, but it doesn't have the prestige some want it to have.
I hear you, but it surely isn't meaningless as any pro today would love to have it on his palmarès.Which is y I specifically said: “I am aware that riders target it…”
As @Extinction pointed out Olympics simply do not have the history and tradition within pro cycling. That is a simple fact. The Worlds Champ wears a specific jersey for an entire year. For the Olympics, the rider has to be provided with a golden helmet or bike by their sponsor as a gimmick. How many pro cycling Olympics have there been? 7-8? All in recent times so…
Meaningless to me anyway.
An indicator of the Olympics' prestige: "Riders base their schedule during an Olympic season heavily around the Olympics."Look at which riders perform well in a race instead of stating random opinions based on nothing.
Possibly though maybe it’s hard enough already given how rare it is for riders in the top 10 to finish in groups larger than 2.I don't think it's overrated, in the sense that it doesn't go before monuments, but it has rapidly since its recent inception effectively become the latest classic. I think it's beauty and challenges warrant such an honor, I would only lengthen it to 250 km.
Ok, but 230-240 km would be optimal to elevate the cojones.Possibly though maybe it’s hard enough already given how rare it is for riders in the top 10 to finish in groups larger than 2.
I'm even surprised people put Giro/Vuelta above some monuments. I would prefer to win de Ronde or Roubaix compared to a Vuelta
Sounds good to me, putting it on a par with Gent-Wevelgem for distance, as long as that does not put any riders off ahead of T-A and MSR.Ok, but 230-240 km would be optimal to elevate the cojones.
Why? Because it's more days? Then a 1 week stage race is also above any 1 day race?a GT is above any 1 day race
The 1 week stage races aren't the biggest of their own kind. And neither are the monuments. WC/ORR vs Vuelta maayyybe but that's it.Why? Because it's more days? Then a 1 week stage race is also above any 1 day race?
I'm on the fence about it btw. I was writing a paragraph on why 1 day races can be more important, but while writing it I felt that I might be wrong.