But Roglic is always riding defensively against strong opponents. In the wheels and sometimes attacking in the last km of a climb or an uphill finish. He has only attacked from far when confronted with weaker opponents. Of course his full right. Concerning the Evenepoel fans. I think they are just very moderate taking into account the anti-supporters of Evenepoel. Confronted with the almost daily dredge and hate messages of those antisupporters. Why act against a rider ? Or you are a neutral spectator and enjoy cycling. Or you are a fan of one or more riders and you respect the opponents. Of course you don't have to like them. Myself having respect and admiration of the skills (explosiveness and uphill finishcapacities) of Roglic. But I don't like the way he competes in general and I don't like his personality. No problem at all.You're knocking at the wrong door.. Straw man fallacy.
My criticism is mostly directed at Remco fans. I think he's very talended, although not very bright and cocky. And Remco fans help creating a public persona for Remco himself. This is clear.
Pogacar is in a different league in terms of talent and showmanship. For the momento there is no comparison whatsoever that doesn't get punched KO.
Other riders choose to ride in terms of strategy because they know themselves better than Remco. Remco himself as acknowledge how he has made mistakes while riding.
An example is how since Volta a Catalunya the Remco fanbase has been insisting of Roglic riding defensively. Other fans, not necessarily affilitated with Roglic's, have trampled such readings multiple ways and multiple times.
No need to think like this.