Remco is looking more like Simon Yates in 2017-2018
For some, speaking as a grown-up is already too difficult.Lol the almighty Remco. Kid playing with the grownups and getting burned. Stay on shorter races and leave GT racing to the big league.
All Belgium smartasses...a baloon of hot air.
You have no clue about cycling.Well, looks like all the smartasses in the race thread were wrong. Not sick and injured. How about we wait next until the interviews before claiming us to be trolls and have no clue about cycling?...
The almighty works in mysterious ways. Only the most devoted could ever understand it.Lol the almighty Remco. Kid playing with the grownups and getting burned. Stay on shorter races and leave GT racing to the big league.
All Belgium smartasses...a baloon of hot air.
Then by all means, stop.For some, speaking as a grown-up is already too difficult.
The only thing that makes sense to me is overtraining between the Worlds and the Vuelta, particularly the emphasis on 'training on the long climbs' and doing huge multi mountain trainings perhaps in a period where you should actually be doing race specific efforts rather than super high volume work is the only plausible thing I can conjure up.
You're right: I think Wiggo 2012 and Remco 2022 is very similar in the aspect that yes, they won a GT, but the circumstances were incredibly favorable. We really didn't test his vulnerabilities which are recovery and tough mountain stages.Spencer Martin on a podcast yesterday said that he went back through Remco's previous results and he noticed that Remco has never had success on a day that contained two HC climbs and alluded that today might be tough for him. I have no idea if that is true, but if it is, it is pretty telling for his potential as a GC rider.
Obviously the guy has won a Vuelta, and that shouldn't be discounted. On the other hand, this year's field is of much higher quality. Maybe he will have to "pick and choose" his GC's in the future. When Wiggo won his TDF, weren't the mountains fairly "easy" as compared to other years. Maybe focus on GC's with heavy time trials and cobbles? and leave the grand tours with hard mountains for other riders.
Dietary bonk after barely an hour of racing?Could also have been a dietary bonk.
as bad as he is, stage 11 didn't look like anything. just a little pickup for the lineI figured that Evenepoel's form was on a downward trajectory. His uphill sprint in stage 11 looked like an all-out effort, pretty much. A comparatively weak one at that. Let's not forget that he had his teammates block the road. You don't do that if you have superior recovery.
He also said that he was hoping for an easy stage 12 (no echelons, I guess) in order to be ready for the mountain stages. That comment was pretty telling.
No, his dietary intake throughout the Vuelta. He may not have been processing the nutrients properly and as a cumaltive effecthe eventually ran out of juice.Dietary bonk after barely an hour of racing?
Euphemism for his intake of fluids.Dietary bonk as euphemism for being overweight
If someone is already empty from what has led up to it (overtraining, not recovering) the duration doesn't matter. I will bet he was thinking "Oh sh*t" at the first pedal stroke today.Dietary bonk after barely an hour of racing?
This may make sense. There's a lack of knowledge at QS for GC racing and preparation still, I think. Evenepoel's abilities in GTs are still a mystery of sorts. Can he really not handle tough mountain stages, but what then with his wins in tough one day races with plenty of climbing and sustained (long range breakaway) efforts? Does he really have limited recovery (and can that be trained)? Wrong diet? Wrong training? Many questions, and I do not think they can answer or resolve them at QS.The only thing that makes sense to me is overtraining between the Worlds and the Vuelta, particularly the emphasis on 'training on the long climbs' and doing huge multi mountain trainings perhaps in a period where you should actually be doing race specific efforts rather than super high volume work is the only plausible thing I can conjure up.
If that were true, Remco wouldn't have been dropped on the first real climb of the day, he'd have cracked on the Tourmalet. They say he wasn't sick or injured...well I can only presume there's something they're hiding or maybe he is actually sick but hasn't realised it yet. Even if he'd been up all night on the booze he shouldn't be this bad.Spencer Martin on a podcast yesterday said that he went back through Remco's previous results and he noticed that Remco has never had success on a day that contained two HC climbs and alluded that today might be tough for him. I have no idea if that is true, but if it is, it is pretty telling for his potential as a GC rider.
Obviously the guy has won a Vuelta, and that shouldn't be discounted. On the other hand, this year's field is of much higher quality. Maybe he will have to "pick and choose" his GC's in the future. When Wiggo won his TDF, weren't the mountains fairly "easy" as compared to other years. Maybe focus on GC's with heavy time trials and cobbles? and leave the grand tours with hard mountains for other riders.
It becomes more of an imperative for Remco and his camp, but I think it makes it less likely that Ineos is interested. Maybe Ineos still wants Remco, but maybe not at the price his dad was asking for.Ineos becomes even more imperative at this point if SQS cannot figure out what happened or what training/diet to do so that he does not collapse midway through a GT
This may make sense. There's a lack of knowledge at QS for GC racing and preparation still, I think. Evenepoel's abilities in GTs are still a mystery of sorts. Can he really not handle tough mountain stages, but what then with his wins in tough one day races with plenty of climbing and sustained (long range breakaway) efforts? Does he really have limited recovery (and can that be trained)? Wrong diet? Wrong training? Many questions, and I do not think they can answer or resolve them at QS.