Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread

Page 675 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
After thinking about this a bit more I think he could peak about as well for the Tour as he just did for the Giro. The infection is mostly irrelevant. If any of the top Tour contenders were announced to have caught a virus today it wouldn’t remotely change my expectations for their Tour form. Treating this as a 1-week tune up race with a rest week then an altitude camp would be considered ideal prep for many riders. Of course he planned to peak for the Giro, but I think that is a bit overrated considering he never blew his load which makes it quite different. True, not the same as a targeted peak, but very very close. I don’t really care what he does but I would probably want to go for it.
Covid infection mostly irrelevant? It will depend on the symptoms. If he needs to stay off his bike for a week it’s simply impossible to build up his form to a level good enough to fight for a podium against riders that were pointing their entire season preparation for TDF. Even David Gaudu will be out of his reach!
 
If the career goal is to win the Tour then getting 3rd doesn't really help that goal does it?
Getting third is a good average. He can be fifth and he can be first if all goes well. There may be only 5 years where you can start the race and have a chance to be competitive. So he just need to try it even if the circumstances are sub optimal. Things can go wrong. He knows that. He was heading to a giro as top favourite but dropped of a bridge. He tried to start the next one too early in his recovery and failed. His third attempt ends with covid.
 
I think the narratives are partly driven by the fact that many people do not believe covid is a real thread so they look for other reasons. There is a real split in our society between those that think covid is just a cold and those that understand the risks in particular for certain people (obese, old, sportsmans etc). Many people are basically experimentalists. They need to see something before they believe something. If you were never exposed to deadly or severe risk (yourself, family, friends ...) then there is no risk. On top of that you have the "viral" belief that vaccines are bad. This is as old as there are vaccines and except for religious regions typically comes from the false idea that vaccines are deadly in particular for young people so you don't do it even if it would protect society as a whole. So even when there is the real drama due to covid, the vaccine can be used as the narrative why he or she or they suffered or died.
Would be sad to think that's driving it, and I would suggest that when others have left the race due to COVID (before and during), those departures have happened without the kind of insane conspiracy theories which followed Remco's departure.

This appears to be about people trying to stick a negative narrative to Evenepoel. And rampant stupidity. But I'll grant you the Venn diagram of anti-vax buffoons and people who can't look at a situation and rationally analyze it is pretty close to a circle.
 
Resuming the options:

1. do the Tour for GC.
pro: he should be able to compete, disregarding any potential long-term covid effects.
con: he has a very short time, hasn't prepared any stages, and is thrown in the lion's cage. Patlev promised his parents he would be careful with Remco's trajectory when he signed him, and he wouldn't skip steps. Doing the Tour for GC is maybe skipping a step. Other con: he won't be ready / good for the World's.

2. do the Tour but not for GC (stage wins, helping,...)
pro: riding a Tour is always good for any rider, he can only come out better and stronger. Other pro: he has sacrificed much / trained hard for the Giro. Now that's gone, he needs another big goal. Other pro: he can ride himself into shape for the World's.
con: if he doesn't win a stage, it's a kind of 'lost' GT. Remco isn't made for filling the pack. Other con: no Vuelta. Other con: what about the rest of the season? It will be end of July and after the World's, there aren't many big goals maybe, or too far away for a 3rd peak (like Lombardia)?

3. don't do the Tour. Stick to the plan.
pro: not too much stress and the comfortable thought that he can take all the time to recover, but the pitfall is that no big goals usually don't lead to a lot of motivation / big performances.
con: small races / not as many race days / no real alternative (if no Vuelta) = filling up the calendar but for what exactly? Without another GT, this year will, in the end, look a lot like e.g. 2019 with only small stage races etc.

Just thinking about it, I still like 1 and 2 much better than 3., even if that would include doing the vuelta…life is too short to skip the Tour before you’re 30, Remco! He only had like 5-6 chances in his prime, so he should just do it, even preferably for gc, and see where he ends up.
 
Hard one IMO. I think what might make the biggest sense it try to fluke Worlds without 100% prep, Vuelta peak and Lombardia, but I would prefer him doing Tour de France. But I doubt that's the smartest thing if you just wanna beef up your palmares, so thats purely selfish on my part.
Worlds route isn't that great for him IMO, and it's a very high variance race at best, so it should not be the main reason to decide between Tour and Vuelta.
 
Can't be too many riders who won all three so let's check. Especially not in the past because of how the calendar was different. The Vuelta used to be in april/may.
It's actually Hinault and Contador is 'only' 3rd.

  1. Bernard Hinault (14/11/1954): Won the Giro of 1980 at 25 years 6 months 23 days of age.
  2. Felice Gimondi (29/09/1942): Won the Vuelta of 1968 at 25 years 7 months 13 days of age.
  3. Alberto Contador (06/12/1982): Won the Vuelta of 2008 at 25 years 9 months 15 days of age.
  4. Eddy Merckx (17/06/1945): Won the Vuelta of 1973 at 27 years 10 months 26 days of age.
  5. Jacques Anquetil (08/01/1934): Won the Vuelta of 1963 at 29 years 4 months 7 days of age.
  6. Vincenzo Nibali (14/11/1984): Won the Tour of 2014 at 29 years 8 months 13 days of age.
  7. Chris Froome (20/05/1985): Won the Giro of 2018 at 33 years 0 months 7 days of age.
Tony Rominger and Miguel Indurain came close to winning all three. But let me know if I missed someone.
Looks like nobody will be breaking Hinault's record now. Bernal (being 26 years and 4 months old) is of course already out.

Even if Pogacar rides the Vuelta this year (and wins it) and then wins the Giro next year he would be about 25 years and 8 months old.

Evenepoel has until TDF 2025. But even if he wins the Tour it is unlikely that his future schedule will accommodate a Giro in 2024 or 2025.
Frankly I can see it being years and years before he attempts it again even if he ends up being a step below Vingegaard and Pogacar in the TDF.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SHAD0W93
As much as I think he is a twit, I think the way he went out was both beautiful, and tragic. He won a freaking TT with Covid, and was obviously sick. That's takes a hard man. I hate that he had to lose the Giro that way. Legs should always be the decider.

And if you're one of those who thinks he should have kept riding, I think you're pretty awful at assessment of situations. He was toast after the TT, and that wouldn't have immediately gotten better.
 
If the career goal is to win the Tour then getting 3rd doesn't really help that goal does it?

Just reading through these last few pages, I have to say I don't get the "he must choose between 3rd in Tour versus Vuelta win number 2" angle.

This is sport. Unless someone has a crystal ball, no one knows where anyone will finish in a race. I mean for sure teams & riders can maximize their potential but imagine (for the sake of argument) Pogacar hasn't recovered well from his injury & Vingegaard crashes out of the TdF, leaving the race wide open & Hindley wins (I'm just just hypothesizing a scenario here). Then two weeks later Evenepoel smashes the Worlds before himself losing the Vuelta for xyz reasons.

No Bueno & a misuse of talent IMO. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. And it's also a matter of fact the TdF route planners have had an aversion to ITT's for a while now (ergo there's no guarantee future editions have anywhere near as many ITT km's as the current Giro does) & it's not like Vingegaard & Pogacar are going anywhere, i.e. they'll always be there in July for the foreseeable future (next 5 years easily).

So to be honest I think the time to strike is now, i.e. after Pog's own injury & after Evenepoel barely dug into his reserves in Italy. As for 'peaks', modern cycling seems to have by & large left that era of seasonal peaking behind. Evenepoel himself has demonstrated he's capable of holding top form for large parts of the season.
 
And if you're one of those who thinks he should have kept riding, I think you're pretty awful at assessment of situations. He was toast after the TT, and that wouldn't have immediately gotten better.
And with how brutal today was, it would have been even worse for him. He’ll get some rest and recover for whatever goals he sets out for. I would like him to do TdF for stages and build up to Worlds or Vuelta for GC. To counter @Logic-is-your-friend argument of if he stays in the GC group and just attacks away to win the stage he might as well go for GC, without GC expectations there is a lot less pressure on him. Winning one to three stages would be great.
 
Just reading through these last few pages, I have to say I don't get the "he must choose between 3rd in Tour versus Vuelta win number 2" angle.

This is sport. Unless someone has a crystal ball, no one knows where anyone will finish in a race. I mean for sure teams & riders can maximize their potential but imagine (for the sake of argument) Pogacar hasn't recovered well from his injury & Vingegaard crashes out of the TdF, leaving the race wide open & Hindley wins (I'm just just hypothesizing a scenario here). Then two weeks later Evenepoel smashes the Worlds before himself losing the Vuelta for xyz reasons.

No Bueno & a misuse of talent IMO. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. And it's also a matter of fact the TdF route planners have had an aversion to ITT's for a while now (ergo there's no guarantee future editions have anywhere near as many ITT km's as the current Giro does) & it's not like Vingegaard & Pogacar are going anywhere, i.e. they'll always be there in July for the foreseeable future (next 5 years easily).

So to be honest I think the time to strike is now, i.e. after Pog's own injury & after Evenepoel barely dug into his reserves in Italy. As for 'peaks', modern cycling seems to have by & large left that era of seasonal peaking behind. Evenepoel himself has demonstrated he's capable of holding top form for large parts of the season.
It's all based on the narrative that he can go to the Tour without pressure. I simply argue that's no good reason to go to the Tour. Go to the Tour if you think you can win it, but don't do it cause it's acceptable to lose there.