Maybe. I just have it in my mind they are going for a slow burn. a build up to the Tour where Remco should be at his very best. Competetive before that yes, but not for trying to hit a major peak.
Remco can physically be at his life long peak. The guy showed today that if he wants to drop you on rolling terrain he can do it, he showed today multiple times he can toast the legs off of @97% of other riders.
Remco showed that sucking is relative, a bad race for him is being able to beat everyone accept for elite climbers, who constantly have him ending his campaign with colossal consternation.
Remco's memory of constant humiliation will not be erased when he gets to a grand tour, instead he will see backs of the most talented climbers going up the road and his disappointment will rush over him.
He needs some positive feedback, positive, affirming racing experience were he is shoulder to shoulder with Pogacar, Vingegaard, Del Toro, Seixas, Ayuso, and half dozen other outstanding climbers. So far it's all theoretical preparation, no meat, not much real.
I am obviously in the minority that believe that showing up and getting beat is far worse, super damaging and harmful than not attending the race.
Half glass full people will list some positive things Remco can take away, while still losing the race. I get it, I completely disagree, but I get why people don't want to chalk it up to learning experience, after all he did beat a hundred and something other racers, still can't touch the guys who were untouchable to him before the race.