Mosf part after la Redoute suites more Remco than Pogacar. Everything except 1 km at la Roche aux faucons...that considering Pogacar is better than Remco is short climbs without cobbles.
It is true that they have been riding for several years already, but we havent got the oportunity to whach that so far in all those years to be so sure Pogacar is better.
Pogacar couldnt drop Pidcock at Cipressa or Poggio, you tall as if he was super at that kind of climbs compared to Remco. Remco catched Pogacar at Amstel with several hard short climbs with just a little help by Skelkmose. Remco has won several times San Sebastian who has harder climbs than Lieja.
As well I remember the European that Remco hold Pogacar attack more than 1 km, after 2 km of hard climb, similar to la Redoute.
In longer climbs Pogacar is better. Remco destroy almost everybody at 7 km climbs, except Pogacar (I mean classics, other way is Vingegaard in the equation), but at 2 km climbs??? I am not sure Pogacar is better, at least to drop him.
Pogacar is crazy strong at 2 km climbs, but Remco as well.
And this time we have Seixas in the equation, so he can play a role bewteen them,
it is possible that Remco does not get well positioning before la Redoute, or he lost ten secopnd there with pogacar and he has some people with him who dont collaborate and then stop , so Pogavcar wons as usual, with 1 minute since la Redoute, or, lots of possible scenarios, but everybody has clear than if Pogacar has won San Remo and almost Roubaix, and Liege suit him much better and he has beated Remco at Worlds, Europeans and Lombardia clearly, this time will be the same, but it is a different kind of race.
Best whises!