• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

The revenge of Rasmussen ...

Page 51 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
neineinei said:
http://www.usada.org/wp-content/uploads/AAA_decision_Leinders_December_2014.pdf (page 8)

According to his testimony to USADA Rasmussen doped up to the confession, in January 2013. At the press meeting 31 January 2013 Claus Hembo (owner Christina Watches) said Rasmussen had been doping from 1998 to the spring of 2010, and in Anti doping Danmark press release from 31 January 2013 it also says:

http://www.antidoping.dk/om-add/aktuelt/2013/01/michael_rasmussen_uk

??

Good find.

Apparently he didn't get the 2006 memo.

Dave.
 
neineinei said:
http://www.usada.org/wp-content/uploads/AAA_decision_Leinders_December_2014.pdf (page 8)

According to his testimony to USADA Rasmussen doped up to the confession, in January 2013. At the press meeting 31 January 2013 Claus Hembo (owner Christina Watches) said Rasmussen had been doping from 1998 to the spring of 2010, and in Anti doping Danmark press release from 31 January 2013 it also says:

http://www.antidoping.dk/om-add/aktuelt/2013/01/michael_rasmussen_uk

??
As long as it isn't stated in his testimony nor said by himself, I think it's a mistake by USADA.

Especially since he says in his book that he stopped in '10 and that it was only his results before that which were annulled.

http://www.dif.dk/da/nyt/dif-nyheder/2013/september/20130927_rasmussen

I forbindelse med behandlingen af sagen be****tede dopingnævnet, at Michael Rasmussens resultater i perioden januar 2005 til marts 2010 bliver annulleret.
 
May 19, 2010
1,899
0
0
Visit site
Netserk said:
As long as it isn't stated in his testimony nor said by himself, I think it's a mistake by USADA.

Especially since he says in his book that he stopped in '10 and that it was only his results before that which were annulled.

http://www.dif.dk/da/nyt/dif-nyheder/2013/september/20130927_rasmussen

Yes, it is the most plausible explanation. ADD were present at his talks with USADA, whatever the ex FBI guy made him say ADD heard it too.

And his results with Christina Watches...

graphRiderHistory.asp
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
D-Queued said:
Good find.

Apparently he didn't get the 2006 memo.

Dave.
the 2006 premise is on the 8 year SOL.

so the true memo, is today less SOL.

And on this schema, Chicken failed to read the handbook

australian idiom: Steggles Inghams
Indian idiom: tikka masala
 
neineinei said:
Yes, it is the most plausible explanation. ADD were present at his talks with USADA, whatever the ex FBI guy made him say ADD heard it too.

And his results with Christina Watches...

graphRiderHistory.asp

It couldve been so great, during his ban he managed to tap off so many bloodbags that he couldve ridden on them for the next 10 years, then Matchiners clinic got sweeped and they had to throw it in the river. Though they saved the transfusion machine and stored it in a safehouse close to where Matchiner lived, produced some more bloodbags but once that got raided he decided to just give up doping.

What a shame.
 

TRENDING THREADS