• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

The Role of TTTs in Stage Races

Apr 9, 2011
3,034
2
0
Mod Edit: These posts have been split away from the 2013 TdF thread


McLovin said:
Following the Corsican stages which will set in motion the 2013 Tour de France, the pack will travel to Nice for a team time trial which will inaugurate the "mainland" stages of the 100th edition of the race.


http://www.letour.fr/2012/TDF/COURSE/us/actus.html#zone184937


le:

4th STAGE
Tuesday 2nd July
Nice > team time trial

After the Grand Depart of the 100th Tour de France in Corsica, it is at Nice that the race will make its re-entry to the mainland. The 4th stage will be a team time trial on the streets of the capital of the French Riviera. The starting point is yet to be determined, but the finish, as was the case in 1981, is already booked for the Promenade des Anglais. The length of the stage will be around 20 km.

5th stage
Wednesday 3rd July
Cagnes-sur-Mer > …

The race will kick off at Cagnes-sur-Mer, a town to the west of Nice, playing host to the Tour de France for the first time. The peloton will then head towards...

TTT @ 20 is too short 35 about right IMO.

Hitch will be a long soon to complain about the TTT ;)
 
cineteq said:
That's your opinion. Others feel is great thing.

Not I. While it may be nice to look at, it puts the contenders on the less moneyed teams at a serious disadvantage. It seems they usually have it in the first week, taking those riders out of contention even before the mountains arrive. The big budget teams with contenders get to ride defensively the rest of the Tour, not allowing anyone off the front that could be a threat or at least not giving them too much rope. I accept that it is a part of the sport but I don't have to like its effect.
 
Descender said:
Seriously?

And who exactly do these others think they are that they feel smug enough to hold opinions different from mine??

Oh, how good I feel to share the opinion of the almighty Descender. ;)

No, seriously, it's beautiful to watch, but it's just too unfair for certain talented riders (*cough* Samu *cough*)capable of riding top 5/podium in a GT, but don't have a good team for the TTT.
 
LaFlorecita said:
Oh, how good I feel to share the opinion of the almighty Descender. ;)

No, seriously, it's beautiful to watch, but it's just too unfair for certain talented riders (*cough* Samu *cough*)capable of riding top 5/podium in a GT, but don't have a good team for the TTT.
For that matter, the Giro 2011 was very unfair because it has too many hard MTFs, it didn't play fair for the rest of the riders :rolleyes:
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
cineteq said:
For that matter, the Giro 2011 was very unfair because it has too many hard MTFs, it didn't play fair for the rest of the riders :rolleyes:

Yet the guy without a team still dominated all the mountains.
 
cineteq said:
For that matter, the Giro 2011 was very unfair because it has too many hard MTFs, it didn't play fair for the rest of the riders :rolleyes:

The Giro 2011 was too unbalanced in favour of climbers.

But you can always redress the balance in a fairer way, rather than making it so that the GC could hang on the TT capabilities of Juanjo Oroz, David López or Kristijan Koren, by doing something else to take the balance away from the lightweight pure climbers, like, I don't know, an individual time trial.
 
Jun 16, 2009
19,654
2
0
cineteq said:
That's your opinion. Others feel is great thing.

Great to watch or Great for the event/race itself? I like watching TTT's as a spectacle. It takes a lot of skill and I enjoy the team aspect of the race but it is not remotely fair. The tdf gc is an individual race therefore it makes no sense for a team race to be counted in an individual classification.
 
Libertine Seguros said:
The Giro 2011 was too unbalanced in favour of climbers.

But you can always redress the balance in a fairer way, rather than making it so that the GC could hang on the TT capabilities of Juanjo Oroz, David López or Kristijan Koren, by doing something else to take the balance away from the lightweight pure climbers, like, I don't know, an individual time trial.
I like short TTTs because is yet another hurdle for GC riders among many others, but as long as the GT has a balanced parcours and possibilities for different riders to shine. It adds to the tactics. I definitely would hate that it can be too decisive for the final outcome. Lastly, it gives all the team riders the opportunity contribute to the overall victory of their GC guy.
 
LaFlorecita said:
A rider's GC shouldn't depend on the TT capabilities of his teammates. Whether one loses or wins time on a MTF primarily depends on oneself.
So why should teams exist in the first place? Shouldn't be better to have individual participation instead?
 
Libertine Seguros said:
Thank you very much, but I will throw Prudhomme a bone - I'm not beholden to any sponsors, so I don't have to go where the money is. I'm certainly more likely to be guilty of Zomegnan's flaws than Prudhomme's.

Even if you were severely restricted, Id trust you to include a good enough balance between tts and mountains. To be fair I think half the forum could manage it but Christian seems as yet, incapable.
cineteq said:
For that matter, the Giro 2011 was very unfair because it has too many hard MTFs, it didn't play fair for the rest of the riders :rolleyes:

LaFlorecita said:
A rider's GC shouldn't depend on the TT capabilities of his teammates. Whether one loses or wins time on a MTF primarily depends on oneself.

its as if some people havent worked out that the ttt punishes riders based on their teammates abilities.

No wonder they think a ttt is fair:cool: While PR is presumably unfair because its too biased to those cobbled riders.