- May 3, 2010
I'd also add questions about Mick Rogers and Possoni as well.
He didn't want those facts?Dr. Maserati said:I dont often agree with Benotti - but they are valid questions.
I would add a more pointed on Mick Barry.
He was first implicated way back in May 2010 by Floyd, Brailsford said they would attempt to establish the facts.
So, why did he not allow Kimmage to interview Barry at the TdF in 2010?
Which boundaries are we talking exactly?Doctor's orders: The Dr Michele Ferrari Journal
Dr Michele Ferrari, coach to cycling greats including Moser, Bugno, Argentin and Rominger, in addition to four-time Tour de France winner and defending champion Lance Armstrong, has never been afraid to push the boundaries of sports science.
In the centenary edition of Le Tour, cycling's most controversial sports doctor will be providing Cyclingnews readers with his unique insight into the mindset of what makes or breaks a champion.
I dont expect Sky to do anything. They'll talk to Murdoch media outlets and BBC who are about as impartial any old dictatorship of yore when it comes to British sport.Mrs John Murphy said:I'd also add questions about Mick Rogers and Possoni as well.
It's the ridiculous way in which statements are ended with '....but hey, Team Sky and Wiggins are clean!'. No questions asked. No investigation regarding Leinders or their signing Rogers/Possini.Benotti69 said:I dont expect Sky to do anything. They'll talk to Murdoch media outlets and BBC who are about as impartial any old dictatorship of yore when it comes to British sport.
Now is the time to sieze the moment and bombard these people with hard questions. We have the facts now get them to explain the truth and not hide behind the usual lies of it was the past or worse Wiggins bullsh!t of lies so stupid that he must think people are babies.
Wiggins has gone beyond the pale in lying!
Benson, Friebe, Westemeyer, Weislo. He's talking about you.For those who have followed the sport for several decades none of this is a surprise, less so if you’ve been watching since the L’affaire Festina broke in 1998. Claiming innocence or surprise about what was happening to cycling after that event meant you were wilfully blind - none more so than the UCI and journalists covering the beat.
It also seems that the closer you are to the sport and to Armstrong the less you saw. Omerta.
Most ****ing definitely.Mrs John Murphy said:The media performance today in the McQuaid press conference shows that Benson's words about 'tougher journalism' are about as meaningful as the Sky anti-doping pledge.
No hope for the sport as long as the current band of hacks remain responsible for holding the UCI to account.
Absolute ****ing disgrace.
which would mean they were just as mute as the other sockpuppet imposters, who labelled themselves journalists. In that case they could've just as well not bothered to waste money on the flightMrs John Murphy said:It would be pretty bizarre if CN wasn't at perhaps one of the most significant press conferences in cycling history.
I'm sure they enjoyed the free food and drinks.Lukenwolf said:which would mean they were just as mute as the other sockpuppet imposters, who labelled themselves journalists. In that case they could've just as well not bothered to waste money on the flight
It is copypastism. CN are not interested in Journalism. That is so obvious.Mrs John Murphy said:Isn't this the kind of article where CN needs to be a lot more critical of riders.
Contador claims that there is no test evidence against Armstrong and all the evidence is from before 2005.
This is left unchallenged by CN.
This has subsequently been repeated and cited on this forum as 'the truth'.
However, we and CN also know that this claim is untrue as i) witness testimony is proof and ii) there is new test evidence as the USADA report makes quite clear that the study of Armstrong's blood profiles from 2009-2010 shows strong evidence of blood doping.
This is exactly how myths like 500 tests passed get built up because no one ever stops the rider, or even in the write up, pauses to say 'well actually what this rider is saying isn't true because x,y,z
Stories like this in their present form are not journalism but churnalism.
thought this is felicitous.. “News is something somebody doesn't want printed; all else is advertising.” - William Randolph HearstMrs John Murphy said: