The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Just to rectify this, it's because she crashed on that climb.Libertine Seguros said:most notably Kiesenhofer missed the split on the climb and lost another 48" to the rest of the contenders, thanks to the vagaries of thrown together mixed selections.
Thanks for the correction and the additional detail, I hadn't picked up on that - I tried to follow the race after-the-fact using updates, but without a great deal of in-play info during the stages, and none of it in the languages I speak best, there's always the potential for me to miss something like that._anna_ said:Just to rectify this, it's because she crashed on that climb.Libertine Seguros said:most notably Kiesenhofer missed the split on the climb and lost another 48" to the rest of the contenders, thanks to the vagaries of thrown together mixed selections.
Valv.Piti said:Its kinda sad the only chances we have to see women race is the crits in Paris and Madrid and obviously the Worlds, on TV that is. It doesn't necessarily make for some great racing and therefore, not increased interest in the women's peloton. I guess it is what it is, but it surely isn't a good window to show women's cycling off, but maybe its better than nothing.
On the section where I had to pull a big gear, I came a tiny bit too short to pull through. Now here, I can compete with the best which I couldn't manage in Rio. I realise now more than ever what I've missed in Rio.
A lot will depend really. The Olympic cycle has a much more prominent effect in women's cycling. I think the biggest loss to the racing is going to be Emma J, undoubtedly, because she's so key to the racing in such a wide spectrum of events and due to experience and race smarts seemingly always makes the right selections. Bronzini is a great experienced hand, but the last couple of years have seen her relying on experience and guile to beat the riders coming through who now have superior top end speed; there are some other riders in Giorgia's mould in the péloton, while Abbott only races sporadically and while her tempo in the mountains usually breaks things apart, her lopsided skillset and unwillingness to break from the calendar she feels comfortable with means that there's only going to be a few races - the Giro and the US domestic races - that will really suffer from an enjoyability point of view from her absence. Stevens I think is a big loss, as I always really liked her, but Boels have already replaced her quite comprehensively with the signing of van der Breggen - and Evie did a reduced calendar over the last couple of years which means that her absence may not be as immediately felt as Johansson. She has a great backstory that makes her easy to warm to. Pooley had already retired once already and so this comeback was relatively limited anyhow, and Armstrong is already onto retirement 3.0 and her comeback was very limited in scope anyway so it's hard to have the same attachment to her as the riders I follow week in week out.GuyIncognito said:It's amazing how the riders I enjoy watching are all retiring at the same time.
2017 is going to be a heck of a lot less interesting, that's a given.