Libertine Seguros said:So the future of cycling is one where Purito is seen as a guy who 'goes from afar'. Cool.
One mans definition of drafting is anothers wheelsucking.
Libertine Seguros said:So the future of cycling is one where Purito is seen as a guy who 'goes from afar'. Cool.
ferryman said:One mans definition of drafting is anothers wheelsucking.
Miburo said:I'm coming to accept that Froome will win against Contador but Wiggins too?
Froome is the favorite to win the tour. That's certain...
Waterloo Sunrise said:It's the only efficient tactic. Changing the rules is the response to take if people don't like spectacle anymore, but for the moment, that was much more exciting and uncertain that a 2009 Bertie attack where the stage ends with 4km to go. Anyone claiming they knew Froome would win with 1500m to go is full of ****.
Peccio89 said:let's be honest, unless the gradient is above 10% for a consistent period of time it's impossible to gain a lot of time on the sky train.
Bad feeling in tour prospective.
Publicus said:Brailsford (sp) has to be the best manager/trainer in the business. Just amazing what he's been able to build with this team (top to bottom fitness really is great).
Waterloo Sunrise said:It's the only efficient tactic. Changing the rules is the response to take if people don't like spectacle anymore, but for the moment, that was much more exciting and uncertain that a 2009 Bertie attack where the stage ends with 4km to go. Anyone claiming they knew Froome would win with 1500m to go is full of ****.
SafeBet said:Froomey: team was amazing, they're the reason I was fresher than the other riders in the end.
Nibbles: I hoped Contador could help me more when I attacked but he probably didn't have the legs.
Waterloo Sunrise said:It's the only efficient tactic. Changing the rules is the response to take if people don't like spectacle anymore, but for the moment, that was much more exciting and uncertain that a 2009 Bertie attack where the stage ends with 4km to go. Anyone claiming they knew Froome would win with 1500m to go is full of ****.
El Pistolero said:Everyone knew Froome was going to win. Do you have eyes? Last few years every cyclist at Sky is riding at extremely high level.
Try and look for Froome posts on this forum before 2011 Vuelta. You can count them on one hand.
Waterloo Sunrise said:Q.E.D.
When he was 75 yards behind, still relying on uran, with 1500m to go and the front 3 looking good, only someone fulfilling the criteria I previously mentioned, which you do indeed effortlessly fulfill, could claim you were certain he would win.
Ferminal said:Given the way he made Nibali and Contador **** in Oman with his acceleration I'm sure many people were expecting it as soon as he bridged.
Miburo said:Sarcasm?![]()
El Pistolero said:He does this all the freaking time, watch a bike race please.
Ferminal said:Given the way he made Nibali and Contador **** in Oman with his acceleration I'm sure many people were expecting it as soon as he bridged.
Publicus said:Not being sarcastic. I'm using Porte and Rogers as my examples. The common factor is that they've performed the best under Brailsford. Riis is supposed to be phenomenal but so far he was unable to extract the best from either. Maybe Contador should look to move over to Sky in 2014--to learn from the best.
Waterloo Sunrise said:Yes, i'm talking about 500m before when he was behind and not yet closing.
Waterloo Sunrise said:Yes, i'm talking about 500m before when he was behind and not yet closing.
Miburo said:Sarcasm?![]()
BillytheKid said:Froome like Porte yesterday was very good, but I would not say that was total destruction.
Publicus said:Obviously what Sky is doing must be trainable... Froome rode at a consistent high rate the entire mountain and then had enough to launch the decisive attack with 750 meters to go. What's the proper strategy/tactics to combat that? Ride at a higher average pace than they are comfortable? I'm just at a loss to figure out how the other GT riders can compete...![]()