The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Yeah, I saw that. Anyway, maybe Mollema pulled for Slagter and then let go.roundabout said:Slagter lost 3.13. Mollema 6.25
HiCadence said:I watched the 2 hour highlights of this stage straight after live P-N action and came straight here to find the expected lol.
It's been fun reading the tears, accusations and "cycling is dead i'm quitting watching cycling forever" comments.
It seems like Sky working as a strong team to get Froome the win is proof that Sky are not legit but riders like Chris Horner, santambrogio and Kwiatowski are "Chapeau!" and "Fabulous fabulous ride!"
I think Sky have been working hard on there fitness and each rider knows what exactly needs to be done and each riders knows when to peel off and it seems they got there tactics spot on today with Froome putting in his own single attack at the right time tot ake this stage.
Unless you can provide some sort of proof that Sky are not legit suck it up and deal with it
El Pistolero said:Seems like Rogers forgot all of that rather quickly. I just need to point out the little fact that almost no one knew who the hell Froome was at the start of the Vuelta in 2011.
will10 said:I recall you saying the same at the Dauphine last year Ruben.
It's a valid point but - how long can the other big names not be in shape. There's a lot of climbers in this field and all they could do was get dropped. Froome is targeting the Tour like everyone else, are we supposed to be lead to believe that Sky are maybe just in better shape earlier? Like 2012 you mean? Because to me it seems like Sky have been at 95% since February 2012 and yet the likes of Evans, Rodriguez, Contador, Nibali have all been beaten comfortably time and again.
The Hitch said:Im surprised by Kwiatkowski. Really surprised. 14km at 7% is not exactly a Gilbert catergory climb (and i thought Kwiatkowski would be Cancellara level at climbs).
Doesnt deserve to be in the lead though, since he had a 25 second headstart, but im really beginning to wonder where this could go.
RHRH19861986 said:Rogers as Contadors best man... Kreuziger not there. strange
Kokoso said:It was Kreuziger. Only one who stayed with Alberto at least for a while. Very good performance considering his preparation was affected by illness and that this was his first hard mountain stage this year. Maybe Alberto should stay back and try to get some rest when Roman catched with them, but he attacked almost immediately.
Eh? Should this sentence had any sense?Vino attacks everyone said:Not ACs fault Kreuziger had to get dropped in the first place
Kokoso said:Eh? Should this sentence had any sense?
Taxus4a said:Is it possible to know the climb time to Prati di Tivo, this year and the year before?
jens_attacks said:as expected,they went fast this year up prati di tivo
http://climbing-records.blogspot.ro/2013/03/froomey-new-best-time-up-prati-di-tivo.html
legendary papy horner stronger than last year _O_ in two years he might win the overall!
serfla said:One thing which should worry Froome's and Sky's rivals is improvement since Oman.
While in Oman everybody looked completely spent at the top Of the Green Mountain, today Froome looked noticeably fresher than his rivals, and Sky looked much better overall.
For me, that's the most significant detail after today's stage.
Yes, you're right. My mistake, and I agree. Looking good for Giro showdown with Wiggins.18-Valve. (pithy) said:I don't know, Nibali improved quite a bit since then. I didn't see that coming.
El Pistolero said:C-riders like Geraint Thomas