- May 5, 2011
- 7,621
- 288
- 17,880
Zam_Olyas said:Libertine Seguros would like to have a word with you![]()
what have i done now?
Zam_Olyas said:Libertine Seguros would like to have a word with you![]()
Dekker_Tifosi said:Aside from my poll choices I expect a great deal from Kruopis as well
jens_attacks said:gotta go with petacchi because he's my favourite.he still got the flavour and the superb engine to pisz off cavendish in le tour.so vai alejet!!
also even i like cav,i expect kittel to beat him in most of the races.looking forward to it
Vino attacks everyone said:you mean races Cav is riding with a broken ribb right?
will10 said:I could vote for all of them.
Some serious Kittel bandwagon on here. The lad had a lot of good wins but not many (if any?) against the so called big-name sprinters.
El Pistolero said:Neither has Sagan, but people are calling him the new Gilbert already.
I picked Kittel because his season reminds me of Cavendish's season in '07(and also voted for Cavendish and Greipel of course).
El Pistolero said:Neither has Sagan, but people are calling him the new Gilbert already.
I picked Kittel because his season reminds me of Cavendish's season in '07(and also voted for Cavendish and Greipel of course).
El Pistolero said:Neither has Sagan, but people are calling him the new Gilbert already.
I picked Kittel because his season reminds me of Cavendish's season in '07(and also voted for Cavendish and Greipel of course).
taiwan said:Nah Sagan is remarkable. The stage race GC wins, the 3 stages of the Vuelta, and that mountain stage of the Tour de Suisse he mugged Cunego for, and he was 21. Sagan is not a pure sprinter but he's immense.
skidmark said:There are 20 people who think Kittel would beat Farrar in a sprint, and no one that thinks Farrar would beat Kittel (or, anyone on this poll)? I like Kittel, and Farrar's personality and stupid Transitions advertisement do little for me, but I think it'd be crazy to put him behind even Sagan and Boasson Hagen, let alone miles behind Kittel.
However, that 'zero' on the poll is so pure that I don't even wanna vote for him now...
El Pistolero said:Kittel already beat him at the Vuelta. Ok, Farrar crashed in that sprint, but it was already clear Kittel won by then. As for Edvald Boasson Hagen, no surprise really. He's one of the most over-rated cyclists on this forum.
Clearly his 1 vote shows that he is overrated? 1 vote is so insanely much for the first sprinter in 3 years to stay within a bike length of Cav on Champs Elysees, and he also won a bunch sprint at the TDF and Vattenfall Cyclassics (I know, it's not the biggest race). Rojas has 5 votes but only won 3 (small) races last year and had two 3rd places at the TDF as his best resultsEl Pistolero said:Kittel already beat him at the Vuelta. Ok, Farrar crashed in that sprint, but it was already clear Kittel won by then. As for Edvald Boasson Hagen, no surprise really. He's one of the most over-rated cyclists on this forum.
El Pistolero said:If the Vuelta had more pure flat stages than Kittel would have won them all. So how is Sagan different than Kittel? He's more all-round, but this is a sprinters topic.
Luckily for Kittel the Tour is filled with such stages and the Vuelta normally as well. This year was just exceptional.
skidmark said:There are 20 people who think Kittel would beat Farrar in a sprint, and no one that thinks Farrar would beat Kittel (or, anyone on this poll)? I like Kittel, and Farrar's personality and stupid Transitions advertisement do little for me, but I think it'd be crazy to put him behind even Sagan and Boasson Hagen, let alone miles behind Kittel.
However, that 'zero' on the poll is so pure that I don't even wanna vote for him now...
taiwan said:He's done more. Noone's saying Sagan will rival Cavendish either, At least one person in this thread has Kittel>Cav, which IMO is crazy talk.
It's perhaps not very likely but I don't see how it's crazy, Kittel is one of the most impressive young sprinters we've seen and he could still be improving. He produces a lot more watt than Cavendish and has an outstanding winning mentality.taiwan said:He's done more. Noone's saying Sagan will rival Cavendish either, At least one person in this thread has Kittel>Cav, which IMO is crazy talk.
maltiv said:Clearly his 1 vote shows that he is overrated? 1 vote is so insanely much for the first sprinter in 3 years to stay within a bike length of Cav on Champs Elysees, and he also won a bunch sprint at the TDF and Vattenfall Cyclassics (I know, it's not the biggest race). Rojas has 5 votes but only won 3 (small) races last year and had two 3rd places at the TDF as his best results
I'm not saying EBH deserves any votes here but I really can't see how you're reacting to his 1 vote and use that as a confirmation that he's overrated. It does show that Farrar is underrated though.
El Pistolero said:That's because Sagan is not a pure sprinter, he's much more than that. Kittel wupped Sagan's *** in sprints at Pologne multiple times.
Like I said, this is a sprinter's topic, nothing more.
taiwan said:A topic I always like, and one which isn't usually straightforward. We all know Cav, but there tends to be some disagreement about the next few in the ranking. Different people look for different quallities in a sprinter, and different victories differ in their value. Anyhow, we're looking at next season here: some have switched teams, and some youngsters will be at the next stage of their development. Who, in your opinion will come out of 2012 looking like the big sprinters?
taiwan said:He's done more to merit the hype. Noone's saying Sagan will rival Cavendish either, At least one person in this thread has Kittel>Cav, which IMO is crazy talk.
Reuell said:I hope the 'young' Italians sprinters out there prove their worth and will be able to pick up the torch the aging Napolitano, Petachhi and such, will drop;
Guardini and Modolo to name two, but with Nizzolo, Viviani, Beletti, Gatto, Appolonio, Guarneri and Chicci out there, they have quite a few sprinters I look forward to sprinting in 2012
taiwan said:So why bring Gilbert up? Confusing to compare 'the next Gilbert' hype to 'the next Cavendish' hype as you did, when you're talking about sprinting only. Maybe you were talking about Gilbert as a sprinter only? I followed you off topic.
