Tour 2014 Route Rumours

Page 19 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Ferminal said:
Yeh I like that, missed the names of the climbs though.

Here they are : http://www.letour.fr/le-tour/2014/fr/etape-8.html


Km 142 - Col de la Croix des Moinats7,6 km de montée à 6%
Km 150 - Col de Grosse Pierre3 km de montée à 7,5%
km 161 - Gérardmer La Mauselaine1,8 km de montée à 10,3%



PROFIL.png
 
Jun 6, 2013
265
0
0
The Hitch said:
What you get then thought is morons like Andy Schleck grossly overestimating their own itt ability and wasting 3 mtfs

given some of the bs that came out of contador's mouth this year about how froome was going to fade like in the 12 vuelta, I wouldn't be surprised if he makes the same mistake.

not that it really matters, since froome is heads and shoulders above everyone else in climbing and recovery too

Very true, I did say "theory" ;)
 
Yep, fireworks!

Not sure what's in store for the second Vosges stage (no categorized climbs?) but the PDBF stage is a "real" mountain stage in a "secondary mountain area", first time ever in the Vosges I'd say :

PROFIL.png



Km 30,5 - Col du Firstplan8,3 km de montée à 5,4%
Km 54,5 - Petit Ballon9,3 km de montée à 8,1%
Km 72 - Col du Platzerwasel7,1 km de montée à 8,4%
Km 104 - Col d’Oderen6,7 km de montée à 6,1%
Km 144 - Col des Chevrères3,5 km de montée à 9,5%
Km 161 - La Planche des Belles Filles5,9 km de montée à 8,5%

http://www.letour.fr/le-tour/2014/fr/etape-10.html
 
The Blues said:
This year suggests that Quintana has got the recovery and climbing part covered pretty well. He gained time on Froome on the final two mtfs, remember?

He also gained quite a lot of time on the final sprint stage. Does that mean Quintana is going to gain time on froome in the sprint stages next year :rolleyes:
 
webvan said:
Yep, fireworks!

Not sure what's in store for the second Vosges stage (no categorized climbs?) but the PDBF stage is a "real" mountain stage in a "secondary mountain area", first time ever in the Vosges I'd say :

PROFIL.png



Km 30,5 - Col du Firstplan8,3 km de montée à 5,4%
Km 54,5 - Petit Ballon9,3 km de montée à 8,1%
Km 72 - Col du Platzerwasel7,1 km de montée à 8,4%
Km 104 - Col d’Oderen6,7 km de montée à 6,1%
Km 144 - Col des Chevrères3,5 km de montée à 9,5%
Km 161 - La Planche des Belles Filles5,9 km de montée à 8,5%

http://www.letour.fr/le-tour/2014/fr/etape-10.html

A solid stage to potentially sort out the GC a bit before the first rest day.
 
webvan said:
Yep, fireworks!

Not sure what's in store for the second Vosges stage (no categorized climbs?) but the PDBF stage is a "real" mountain stage in a "secondary mountain area", first time ever in the Vosges I'd say :

PROFIL.png



Km 30,5 - Col du Firstplan8,3 km de montée à 5,4%
Km 54,5 - Petit Ballon9,3 km de montée à 8,1%
Km 72 - Col du Platzerwasel7,1 km de montée à 8,4%
Km 104 - Col d’Oderen6,7 km de montée à 6,1%
Km 144 - Col des Chevrères3,5 km de montée à 9,5%
Km 161 - La Planche des Belles Filles5,9 km de montée à 8,5%

http://www.letour.fr/le-tour/2014/fr/etape-10.html
Good stage in theory but in practice, vomistar will neutralize it.
 
Feb 23, 2012
201
0
0
I have to say this route looks much better than expected. Is this already a post-Pescheux route design perhaps?

The sheffield stage looks good. The cobbled stage is even better than I was hoping for and they finally make some good use of the Vosges mountains. Gerardmer stage and PDBF look very promising.
I also have the feeling the route designers are very font of the Port de Bales in recent years and I agree with them, tough climb and tricky descent should make a good final again to Bagneres-de-Luchon.
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
jens_attacks said:
a grand tour which respects itself should have at least 4000 kms. but that is good though compared to last year i guess...modern cycling...

i like the route gotta say, it will be quite the showdown

I hate this too. there should always be a mountainstage of 250+ km because riding a mountainstage of 250+ is something else completely. you need a big engine for it like classics
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Netserk said:
And how much did they (at least try to) gain in GC? :rolleyes:

gain for what? quintana finished 2nd which was as high as they believed they could and took an extra stage win with costa
 
The cobbles stage should be great fun and the two Vosges stages are looking pretty decent. I reckon the Gerardmer-Mulhouse stage will be less interesting then. Fine by me.

Picked the wrong run-in into Gerardmer but was right about the use of the Mauselaine and I actually prefer the Croix-monats, gross-pierre, mauselaine chain they've got there. Short but punchy climbs. Same goes for the LPDBF stage. Chevréres and LPDBF is a good combination of two short but relatively steep climbs.

Good to see that the Chamrousse stage isn't unipuerto but if they bother to include the Palaquit they might've just as well used the Fort De 4 Seigneurs (8km, 7%) for another climb just ahead of Chamrousse. That would've put the stage at 212km - not much of a different from 200km but would've made the end of the stage a little more interesting.


As for the Pyrenees stages. Words escape me to utter my disgust, really.


Overall - the first week is by far the most interesting with the Sheffield stage, Cobbles and the decent Vosges stages. The last two are badly let down by horribly uninspired and dire mountain stages.