Jagartrott said:
LaFlorecita said:
They're doing a twitter vote now, and then 6 jury members will also cast their vote. De Gendt has a large lead in the twitter vote, probably he Rted the tweet.
IMO Barguil should be the winner, or Matthews. If they want to pick someone who didn't win anything, Dan Martin or Contador. But De Gendt's fake aggressiveness (going in pointless breaks and keeping track of no. of km with the sole aim of winning the prize) doesn't do it for me and his whining in the media about it makes me hope he doesn't win it.
'Fake aggressiveness'?
Except he has been racing like this always, i.e. also when there are no combativity awards. And it has yielded him results too.
Way to personally attack someone who's motivation you do not know.
He has been very vocal that this was his aim and even admitted in interviews on tv that he attacked to win the prize. A few days ago he sadly admitted that he felt he had little chance to win because 5 of the jury members are French, but he hoped Marion Rousse could convince the others to vote for him. Tough luck, Gallopin was selected as well :lol: He even keeps a list of how many km he's been in the breakaway. He's obsessed.
http://m.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20170720_02981097 he was 2nd last year, 3rd the year before so he really wanted to win
His attacks amounted to nothing. It was all for show in the hopes of winning the prize. I know he is and has always been a very aggressive rider and that's why I feel this way of riding should be punished. He doesn't have to fake his fighting spirit. He should pick 3 or 4 stages and go for the stage win.
Looking for that article I also realized how it's possible he has such a big lead and why almost all replies to that tweet supporting him are from Belgians. It's not just that he has retweeted that tweet but several big Belgian news sites are asking their readers to vote.