Tour de France 2020 | Stage 4 (Sisteron – Orcières-Merlette, 160.5 km)

Page 7 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
It depends where he wants to take his career. If he goes the Valverde route, he should be able to get similar GT results as, well, Valverde, while also being (one of) the best in the more hilly classics. For a Tour win, all the stars would need to align though (didn't we say the same about Thomas though?). But he could also win every monument, probably bar Paris-Roubaix, if he doesn't. It's a shame he didn't get to ride Flanders this spring to see where his boundaries are on the cobbles, if he doesn't have it there, he should try for GTs imo.

"Similar" GT results could very well include a Tour de France win though. I mean, Valverde never won the Tour, but I think it would be nonsense to say he couldn't have been capable of doing so had he structured his career differently. Imagine Valverde joining Sky in 2012 or whatever - don't you think he would have had a shot?
 
Alaphilippe is a better rouleur and puncheur than Valverde ever was, and he's also heavier.

Valverde broke onto the scene and immediately finished 3rd in the Vuelta. And even Valverde never evolved into the multi GT winning climber a lot of people had hoped he woudl become.
We've seen plenty of great (and one less-great) riders evolve into GT winners over the course of their careers this decade. Even if they are different kinds of riders, Alaphilippe's Tour was very similar to Dumoulin's Vuelta (not seen as GC riders beforehand, taking time on the punchier climbs and the TT, sufficiently limiting losses in the high mountains before cracking near the end). Not sure if Alaphilippe's potential as a GC rider is the same obviously, but I wouldn't say last year's Tour was a fluke.
 
We've seen plenty of great (and one less-great) riders evolve into GT winners over the course of their careers. Even if they are different kinds of riders, Alaphilippe's Tour was very similar to Dumoulin's Vuelta (not seen as GC riders beforehand, taking time on the punchier climbs and the TT, sufficiently limiting losses in the high mountains before cracking near the end). Not sure if Alaphilippe's potential as a GC rider is the same obviously, but I wouldn't say last year's Tour was a fluke.
Dumoulin , as an ITT prodigy, had a massive engine and a much more reliable weapon than Alaphilippe. He was also only 24 when he broke through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Doopie
People aren't taking into account the possibility that next years tour is packed with hilly stages to suit Alaphillipe. Would make quite an interesting race as well imo

Wouldn´t be suprised if they do it. It´s pretty obvious that they are trying improve the chances of french riders. We had pure climber routes for Bardet and Pinot. Why not have a hilly edition for Alaphilippe.
 
What - DeGendt spends lots of time at the front of races, especially when Ewan is riding in the race - He spent most of the first week at the front in the 2019 TDF.

You are now the second one saying that, so I guess I have to qualify:

First of all, it was just a tongue in cheek remark ;)
Secondly, obviously the premise is a mountain stage, not a sprinters stage :cool:
 
Last edited:
"Similar" GT results could very well include a Tour de France win though. I mean, Valverde never won the Tour, but I think it would be nonsense to say he couldn't have been capable of doing so had he structured his career differently. Imagine Valverde joining Sky in 2012 or whatever - don't you think he would have had a shot?
He's never come within 5 minutes of winning a Tour de France, although he probably would have in 2017 considering the route and how the race unfolded. I don't think he'd ever have started a Tour de France as team leader with Sky, his ceiling was just barely too low imo. Even so, he too could have won a Tour, but again, it would have taken the stars aligning to happen.
 
What are they gonna do. Have the Peyresourde as the hardest climb in the race?
Wouldn´t be suprised if they do it. It´s pretty obvious that they are trying improve the chances of french riders. We had pure climber routes for Bardet and Pinot. Why not have a hilly edition for Alaphilippe.
Loads of hilly stages with a weak first mountain block and then all the tough mountains backloaded would be quite interesting
 
"Similar" GT results could very well include a Tour de France win though. I mean, Valverde never won the Tour, but I think it would be nonsense to say he couldn't have been capable of doing so had he structured his career differently. Imagine Valverde joining Sky in 2012 or whatever - don't you think he would have had a shot?
I have no problem believing Sky could have pulled Valverde over the line. He's a better GC man than Thomas or Wiggins
 
Dumoulin , as an ITT prodigy, had a massive engine and a much more reliable weapon than Alaphilippe. He was also only 24 when he broke through.
So Alaphilippe being a better rouleur than Valverde is evidence against him being the better GC rider, but Alaphilippe being a worse rouleur than Dumoulin is also evidence against him being the better GC rider?