Tour de France Tour de France 2021, Stage 21: Chatou – Paris Champs-Élysées, 108.4 km

Page 7 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Sep 26, 2020
25,722
28,354
23,180
Not that he's faster than Cavendish, but imagine there wasn't a Cavendish in the race and the team would ride for Morkov - it would be problematic though that Morkov wouldn't have a Morkov to lead him out.

He is so good he could have done his own leadout, too. And everyone else would just tire themselves out in the fight to get onto his wheel.
 
Aug 13, 2011
7,940
12,361
23,180
Not that he's faster than Cavendish, but imagine there wasn't a Cavendish in the race and the team would ride for Morkov - it would be problematic though that Morkov wouldn't have a Morkov to lead him out.
I am. Cav won the first two stages without Quickstep in the last KM. Morkov isn’t doing what Cav did. The third stage was textbook but I think WVA beats him. The 4th stage he of course would have won without Cav or a different sprinter he was leading out.
 
Feb 29, 2012
5,765
717
19,680
This stage is less animated than my expectations tbh, but there might be some hope for a late attack.
 
May 5, 2010
52,358
30,743
28,180
WTF, DSM. Bol isn't going to win, get over it. Pedersen was your best chance on this stage.

You're a bit behind, aren't you? Been a while since that happened.
That group got caught, now it's Valgren, Van Moer, and Schelling.
But only around 15 seconds with less than 10 Ks to go.
 
Jun 10, 2017
5,246
3,467
23,180
You're a bit behind, aren't you? Been a while since that happened.
That group got caught, now it's Valgren, Van Moer, and Schelling.
But only around 15 seconds with less than 10 Ks to go.
Well that was reacting to them having men on the front to chase the Schelling group.

Ballerini mechanical.
 
Feb 29, 2012
5,765
717
19,680
Cav is way back in the peloton, that is actually weird.

Edit: And Quickstep actually brought him to the front in due time.
 
Oct 15, 2017
17,052
18,950
28,180
Not really upset, but I dont personally consider Cavendish one of cycling greats regardless. When I think of great riders, its versatile riders than can do lots of stuff and not just put their nose in the wind for the last 200 metres. Boonen, Cancellara, Valverde, Nibali, Gilbert, Contador, Armstrong, Ullrich etc. etc. I all consider better riders for sure, and thats just one the top of my head from riders I grew up watching.

I dont understand why you would try compare him to them in that way. It is not a discussion about who is the overall better rider in terms of ability.

I would say that the best sprinter of all time, arguably, belongs in the conversation as a "cycling great".

His palmares speak for itself. His impact on the sport. An icon and legend in his own right.

If he is such a bad rider, he wouldnt have won all these races. He is a champion that has his place in history forever within the sport.
 
Aug 29, 2011
3,768
2,142
16,680
I dont understand why you would try compare him to them in that way. It is not a discussion about who is the overall better rider in terms of ability.

I would say that the best sprinter of all time, arguably, belongs in the conversation as a "cycling great".

His palmares speak for itself. His impact on the sport. An icon and legend in his own right.

If he is such a bad rider, he wouldnt have won all these races. He is a champion that has his place in history forever within the sport.
I agree. It is kind of like being the greatest goalkeeper.
 
Feb 20, 2010
33,096
15,356
28,180
Cavendish is obviously an all time great. I don't see why that's even debatable. He's not the most exciting in terms of having given us great epic rides or anything, but that's not his job and it's not his fault he comes along at an era when sprinting is so controlled. He's, if not the outright best sprinter of all time, then one of the first names in the discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy262