- Jun 24, 2013
- 3,548
- 1,079
- 16,680
It's not really the train. The train helps, but it's obviously not the train that made Cav 2021.
It's that he started training again after years of being fat and not training.
It's not really the train. The train helps, but it's obviously not the train that made Cav 2021.
www.cyclingnews.com
The irony of that one was the biggest deviation in that sprint was actually Demare. Who won.I know, but realistically that is how it happens. Even in that notorious Cav-Sagan incident, clearly Sagan wouldn't have been DQ'd (what a discussion that was in the forum back then, lol), if Cav had gotten out of it unscathed.
It's that he started training again after years of being fat and not training.
Lotto brought a good train, tbf. They just didn't bring a good backup sprinter, so now they have nobody to lead out, and they're reduced to putting Kluge in the break and deBuyst settling for 12th today.You can put Philipsen, Bouhanni, Bol, Colbrelli in the DQS train and they would win several stages in a Grand Tour tbh.
Alpecin-Fenix is the only thing close and they've wasted two stages going with their second sprinter instead of the quickest.
Sounds quite imbalanced really. Like anyone would regret a hand gesture for any reason, let alone for that. Cav cut him off, quite clearly. Was it relegation-worthy? I don't think so, but anyone rational can see why Philipsen was irritated. And what on earth does the length of Cav's career have to do with it?As Chris Boardman just said on the ITV coverage, Philipsen had more cause to complain about Merlier than he did Cavendish.
And as a fellow child of the Isle of Man, Pete Kennaugh is never going to be the most balanced, but he was even more damning, saying, "I think Philipsen will regret that hand gesture when he watches it back. Cavendish was winning sprints whilst Philipsen was still in nappies".
Lotto brought a good train, tbf. They just didn't bring a good backup sprinter, so now they have nobody to lead out, and they're reduced to putting Kluge in the break and deBuyst settling for 12th today.
Lost his leadout man, Guarnieri to a crash just outside 3km, and ended up 4th. Not a terrible effort under the circumstances.Anyway this is not strong sprint field, Ewen's absence aside. Wth happened to Demare, for example...
Cav cut his leadout man off - at no stage did Cav move on to the same line as Philipsen - it just looks that way as Philipsen tried to move across and discovered someone in front of him with more pace - if Philipsen held a straight line after moving out from Merlier there'd have been no question of any issue.Sounds quite imbalanced really. Like anyone would regret a hand gesture for any reason, let alone for that. Cav cut him off, quite clearly. Was it relegation-worthy? I don't think so, but anyone rational can see why Philipsen was irritated. And what on earth does the length of Cav's career have to do with it?
Kennaugh sounds like a first-class idiot and a homer to boot.
You on the other hand clearly have no axe to grind, and have considered all the evidence before presenting your reasoned opinion.sounds like some extremely objective analysis by the British media about a British athlete
It's the apparent inconsistency that's frustrating isn't it? 2010 Cav would probably have been relegated too. It does appear as though the commissaires develop an impression of a rider and allow that to affect their judgement in these sorts of situations.The irony of that one was the biggest deviation in that sprint was actually Demare. Who won.
I think if Bouhanni did what Cav did today, or what Demare did then, he'd be tarred, feathered, burned in effigy outside his hotel, assigned last place in the peloton, and fined 200CHF.
Yes, Philipsen moved slightly towards Cav...as Cav was swinging from a position to the right of both, across his leadout man and into him. Philipsen's line was fine. But, I said, not relegation-worthy on Cav's part. Good sprint and cheers to Cav for another win. Happy for him.Cav cut his leadout man off - at no stage did Cav move on to the same line as Philipsen - it just looks that way as Philipsen tried to move across and discovered someone in front of him with more pace - if Philipsen held a straight line after moving out from Merlier there'd have been no question of any issue.
this is public forum not court of law, shitposting is the wayAbsolutely silly amount of whataboutisms and unverifiables being thrown around here.
Cavendish moved to the centre too (as did Philipsen, though not as much).Cav cut his leadout man off - at no stage did Cav move on to the same line as Philipsen - it just looks that way as Philipsen tried to move across and discovered someone in front of him with more pace - if Philipsen held a straight line after moving out from Merlier there'd have been no question of any issue.
sounds like some extremely objective analysis by the British media about a British athlete
