The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Except it wasn't a freewheeling descent by Tadej or the guys that caught up to Jonas. Tadej laid down power well past the KOM to get up to speed and then could recover. Another km of climbing would have only doubled the gap. Good tactical riding on Tadej's part.
I watched it closely. At no point did Jonas take back more than a second, only to lose it and more on the following corners. On the flatter portion it should favor the stronger solo rider and most Vindegaard fans are certain he can beat anyone.I'm not knocking Pogacar, his descending was awesome to watch.
I'm just saying it was a descent which suited him - on the technical parts Vingegaard took back time, which means they are good at different parts of descending, and this one heavily favoured Pogacars particular set of skills.
But I will also say there is no way an in-form Vingegaard had lost that much on the high speed parts, so to me he looks 95 % - the question is if there is a crossover point in the Tour, when Pogacar feels the burn of the Giro and Vingegaard rides himself into shape?
A heavier rider needs to push less W/kg to ride the same pace uphill as a lighter rider.Jonas and his weight excuse for losing time on the descent makes me laugh.
If Pog is heavier then surely it's harder for him on the uphill - need more w/kg to stick with Jonas - so what's his excuse there?
(Italians, in "Holy Grail" voice, "We've already got one.")Maybe we have a solution to the French GC drought - hold the entire race in Italy
Same w/kg but more WattsA heavier rider needs to push less W/kg to ride the same pace uphill as a lighter rider.
Nope. Bike weight and wind resistance do not scale linearly with the rider's weight. Here you have an example of how the power calculation for 65 kg is ~0.13 W/kg less than for 57 kg:Same w/kg but more Watts
It would have been a bonus to fans if Bernal and Mateo had hung on, too. Having Ineos with several threats would have made it better for the other contenders. Stage 4 and every team pretty much know who their show ponies are for the time being.
Something I noticed yesterday when I was watching the final kilometers again and before Almeida's hand gesture, it was Pogacar saying something on the radio. So it could have been him saying more pace, where is Ayuso, or else.
On the subject of Ayuso, I find the 'moralistic' condemnations of his behavior (which I'm reading & hearing just about everywhere this morning) so completely... detached from reality, it blows my mind.
Stuff that happens on the road is the result of team tactics & when it's not, it's in most cases the result of what's actually in the rider's contract. It was said a few years ago Ayuso had a clause in his contract which stated he didn't have to work for Pogačar. If he was also contracted to be able to ride the Tour this year, then everything we've seen is easily explainable.
Yates meanwhile was signed as a super domestique. Everyone knows this. So I find the reactions whereby Yates is a top bloke & Ayuso a villain a bit too much. These guys are doing what they're contracted to do. Sepp Kuss for example didn't ride around 'benevolently' helping Rog & Vinge win GT's, i.e. it was his job description. If he didn't do it, they would have gotten someone else to.
What are you on about? No it doesn't. Both Almeida, Ayuso and Landa could have ended Roglic' Tour yesterday. If he drops there, its over. He looked miserable and should be very, very, VERY happy by just being 1.14 down based on his legs. Roglic is scraping by, hoping for a miracle, but he's 34 and his consistently high top level is gone.
The most realistic scenario is Roglic ending somewhere between 4-8th right now.
I usually like your posts. They're well-thought out and insightful. That's why this post is a big disappointment, not because I don't agree (I don't) but because this is not in line with what was expected between riders from the same team. What I'm pointing at here is that I cannot fathom how you write this while holding your line in Vuelta 2023 regarding Vingo's posture.Does anyone? I'm just tired of all the influencers, podcasters & youtubers jumping into the ring with their hot takes looking for drama which generates clicks & traffic, i.e. which in this instance is about portraying Ayuso as some sort of villain because he cares about his own GC placing.
Even 'if' Ayuso had gone rogue, I say good for him. This isn't the United Nations, I'm not looking for anyone to create ever-lasting world peace in the peloton or in these super teams. I had my fill of that last year in the Vuelta when the geniuses on social media decided they didn't want a GC battle in week 3.
So I say let Ayuso race. It'll be fun. If Almeida has a problem with that, I don't care. Hell, if UAE has a problem with that... I don't care either!
Pog is strong enough as it is. It's absurd for some people to pretend he needs Ayuso's devotion anyway. He's a big boy & he can win this Tour with or without 7 riders burying themselves for him.
I usually like your posts. They're well-thought out and insightful. That's why this post is a big disappointment, not because I don't agree (I don't) but because this is not in line with what was expected between riders from the same team. What I'm pointing at here is that I cannot fathom how you write this while holding your line in Vuelta 2023 regarding Vingo's posture.
Yes. It's to cover the range of possible drafting over the whole ascent.That CdA range is rather big
No. 0.09 for Quintana.Do I read correctly that that whole CdA range only makes a difference of 0.01?
As far as we know, Almeida and Ayuso were allowed to join the UAE Tour team under the assumption that Pogacar was the designated leader. There is no room for interpretation that such assumption entails working for Pogacar. So what he saw was Ayuso working like he didn't have to do chores on a Sunday: reluctantly.I'm sorry you're disappointed but It's about context. UAE isn't Jumbo. Rog isn't Pog.
In 2023, Rog was politely pushed towards the Giro & didn't do the Tour. So when he went to the Vuelta & found himself blocked by Kuss (Vingegeaard was perhaps fair enough as co-captain but to lose because his team gave Kuss the lead & then froze positions? No, that was too much).
UAE meanwhile made their bed & now they should sleep in it. They're the ones who brought Ayuso to the Tour de France. They didn't have to. Everyone knows Majka is the most loyal domestique for Pog & guess what? He's at home twiddling his thumbs. From what I've read he was pretty disappointed not to be selected as well. That's on UAE.
The gravel stage yesterday simply confirmed to me there's a hierarchy problem at UAE & no, I don't believe it's Ayuso's fault - or his responsibility to ride for Pog. As things stand Visma's approach to the Tour (all for Vingegaard) is looking like a better approach than UAE's... which seems like going for power > cohesion, especially on a human level.
I think Adam Yates might be the smartest one tbh, i.e. he's totally devoting himself as a dom... but seems to be saving something for later as well, like maybe leadership in the Vuelta.