"Of course it has to change. Modern cameras have high quality zoom, so they can picture from a far most of the time".
The moto camera operator is instructed by the live television director. They will be acting under that instruction.
Yes, the zoom lenses are of excellent quality... they have been for a long time. And they will have image stabilisation. Even with that though, operating at the tight end of the zoom from a distance is going to give inferior images ... less stable. It also foreshortens background distance, so will make the pursuers appear to be considerably closer than they actually are.
The UCI/Race Directors need to be more strict about moto-pacing, but they also have to balance the needs of the broadcasters, advertisers, sponsors etc etc.
Exactly.
Cause it's always been that way, or everyone benefits at one point is not much of an argument to maintain the status quo. They should actively try and reduce things that can affect a race outcome. (main point the rest is just rambling)
Personally i also would not mind if they removed the same time rule, bonus second rule, rule that you can come back behind the cars after a nature break, mechanical. Would rather all of these 'rules' were thrown out the window. and we get closer to racing without interference as much as possible. I would love it if they stopped giving away time gaps. And they no longer knew how much time ahead/behind they are from each other. I would love it if the directors could not tell who is where. Who is in the breakaway, who is getting dropped, .. . If all this info and the tactical advice was no longer allowed.
Mind you i'm aware of some bias as well, as i would not want to go back to riders having to repair their own bikes and not having extra bikes available. I definitely want those mechanics.
I guess I would need to think more on the directors, .. . At heart i would like the riders and peloton needing to think more for themselves. so the no ears thingie during olympics at face value i kinda like. But
safety concers do come into play. If they can find a way to keep things safe, i would be all for less tactical input from the cars. I also understand people who enjoy the tactical car work. Maybe if it were to come to reality, i would want to go back to cars.
But all that underneath the first paragraph is just my own sentiments. I don't think eliminating moto draft as much as possible is something people can argue against.