Tour de Yorkshire, May 2 - May 5 (2.HC)

Page 4 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re:

armchairclimber said:
Off to the start at the wonderful Piece Hall. Dear Mr Prudhomme ... please make us a hilly cobbled classic that starts and finishes in this incredible piazza. Thank you.

Yes sir. That would be amazing with a savage cobbled climb up Shibden Wall in the last 5 km of the course before a twisting descent into town for a flattish finish for the remaining hard classics riders to battle out. The potential mix of cobbled and asphalt short sharp ramps in North and West Yorkshire combined with the high potential for windy conditions could make for a race somewhere in between Amstel Gold and the E3.
 
May 10, 2017
227
3
1,835
Just listened to Kamp's interview with ITV and Daniel Friebe pre-stage start this AM. Said he is very strong on the steep climbs, ,maybe the strongest in the TdY peloton. Also said if he beat GVA in a sprint yesterday, no reason why he cannot do it again today.

Love his confidence, great to see Kamp and the rest of his PCT team taking it to the big boys.
 
MADRAZO said:
I wonder if Lawless will admit gifting the stage to get Avermaet to work in the end here. Such a deal has rarely been more visible. But for sure made sence

Yeah it definitely went down like this
Nice to see Ed Dunbar perform well. I remember last year noticing him for the first time, relentless racing spirit, then still in a AquaBlue jersey
 
Screecher said:
That deal actually made no sense at all. GVA's work wasn't needed, the chasing group wasn't strong enough. Lawless still has a lot to learn.

I just think he rates the overall win much higher than the stage, but yes he could have been greedy and gone for both, but with a small risk of losing both
 
MADRAZO said:
Screecher said:
That deal actually made no sense at all. GVA's work wasn't needed, the chasing group wasn't strong enough. Lawless still has a lot to learn.

I just think he rates the overall win much higher than the stage, but yes he could have been greedy and gone for both, but with a small risk of losing both

Well, it looks like a classic win-win scenario for both parties interested:

- Lawless gets first major success in his career, winning GC in a reputed stage race, without the need to battle for it (even if he probably would prove faster than GvA when it would come to a sprint);
- GvA earns a victory after his unsuccessful spring campaign (not to mention his team which is desperately in need of any win).

In fact, GvA did not contribute too much in the last two or three kilometres - Dunbar effort should be enough to keep the gap.
 
Re:

Danskebjerge said:
Riwal did many things right yesterday - and many things wrong today. Disappointing, but of course good to see the riders in good shape.
I'm not really sure what they did right, to be honest. They should have let Ineos close down the gap to the break, where one of the riders was a potential danger to the GC. In the end, they burned themselves by reeling in the break leaving Kamp isolated for the finale, where he spent too much energy pulling. But that being said, I don't think Kamp would have had the legs to win it today, even if the team had been there for him. GVA was clearly the strongest rider of the day and I am not sure if Kamp could have followed him, had Kamp been on his wheel instead of Froome's on that last ramp.
 
as we say in Italian: godo !
great team, great win, great Dawg, great Dunbar.
surely not the most important of the races, but the importance for the first race for the new sponsor, in Yorkshire, with a Brit, despite the 15000 rubber masks, with a great last stage fought until the end