Dekker_Tifosi said:Yup, should be doable on a hilly course.
Also take in mind that they race the TT on normal bikes, not TT bikes. This could be a real advantage for Gesink.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Yup, should be doable on a hilly course.
Also take in mind that they race the TT on normal bikes, not TT bikes. This could be a real advantage for Gesink.
boomcie said:EBH was 7 seconds ahead in the overall standings. So he only needs 37 seconds in the TT. Or where there bonifications in this stage also?
auscyclefan94 said:Can you others show some consistency in your posts and actually learn to read. You are acting like a moron. I was just stating what I thought happened in the race and guess what? I WAS RIGHT!!!!!!!!! So get lost!
Again you mis interpret my post. The fact EBH, a sprinter (who can climb alright) finished 2nd on a climb like this says that guys like Fuglsang, Pinotti, Rodriguez and others either didn't have the legs or didn't really try. We must remember that this is February. Now you dutchies always have a go at me for being defensive but I think some of you are acting like little babies.
Jamsque said:What races is Gesink targeting to be on such good form so early in the year? I'm surprised none of the other climbers in the race managed to follow him.
The time trial should indeed be an interesting show-down, I suspect Gesink will be able to hold on. Remember, though, that he needs a few seconds buffer left at the end of the stage because EBH could well pick up a few bonus seconds on the last day.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Yup, should be doable on a hilly course.
Also take in mind that they race the TT on normal bikes, not TT bikes. This could be a real advantage for Gesink.
will10 said:Dries .
Gesink has a very good base form. He's pretty good all year round. And of course he had a point to prove today. Look, I'm still there, even after some difficult personal circumstances.Jamsque said:What races is Gesink targeting to be on such good form so early in the year? I'm surprised none of the other climbers in the race managed to follow him.
The time trial should indeed be an interesting show-down, I suspect Gesink will be able to hold on. Remember, though, that he needs a few seconds buffer left at the end of the stage because EBH could well pick up a few bonus seconds on the last day.
Gesink is always in decent form, and this climb suited him perfectly. It was a great performance by EBH, but he can't be a match in this kind of stage.Jamsque said:What races is Gesink targeting to be on such good form so early in the year? I'm surprised none of the other climbers in the race managed to follow him.
The time trial should indeed be an interesting show-down, I suspect Gesink will be able to hold on. Remember, though, that he needs a few seconds buffer left at the end of the stage because EBH could well pick up a few bonus seconds on the last day.
Lanark said:Hagen absolutely demolished the competition last year in the time trial: http://www.cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/race.asp?raceid=16871
I didn't realize last years time gaps were that big.
Contre la montre said:Considering EBH was second I just realized that other people (better timetrialists then EBH) might still be in with a shot at taking the GC.
I see, those are pretty big differences. And I only see rouleurs in the top 20Lanark said:Hagen absolutely demolished the competition last year in the time trial: http://www.cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/race.asp?raceid=16871
I certainly think he is the favorite for the GC, but still a great ride by Gesink.
 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		
 
				
		