Tour Rider Selection and Roles

Page 8 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Nov 6, 2009
799
115
10,180
Lexman said:
why should Steegmans leadout Ciolek? Steegmans won on the Champs Elysees...

Obviously because that was 4 years ago and he hasent shown anything like that since. Ciolek most likely wont win any masssprints, but he will for sure do better than Steegmans.
 
Mar 13, 2009
2,890
0
0
If was OPQS I'm not sure I'd bother with anyone for mass sprints. Hence leave the sprinters at home and take Grabsch, Levi, Velits, Martin, Chavanel, De Weert, Devenyns, Pineau, Vandenberg. I'd like to take Cataldo but i think the tank will be empty.
 
Nov 6, 2009
799
115
10,180
karlboss said:
If was OPQS I'm not sure I'd bother with anyone for mass sprints. Hence leave the sprinters at home and take Grabsch, Levi, Velits, Martin, Chavanel, De Weert, Devenyns, Pineau, Vandenberg. I'd like to take Cataldo but i think the tank will be empty.

What would be the point of taking Grabsch, hope he can get a very doubtful top 5 in the long Time Trials? I don't really see much need for OPQS to pull the peloton much where a rider like him could be usefull. Ciolek should be able to show the teamcolours in the sprints and, and a couple of the sprintstages are a bit harder, so that he might have a chance for some good placements.
 
Mar 13, 2009
2,890
0
0
MADRAZO said:
What would be the point of taking Grabsch, hope he can get a very doubtful top 5 in the long Time Trials? I don't really see much need for OPQS to pull the peloton much where a rider like him could be usefull. Ciolek should be able to show the teamcolours in the sprints and, and a couple of the sprintstages are a bit harder, so that he might have a chance for some good placements.

Because I think Grabsch can do at least as well in the ITTs as Ciolek in the sprints, anonomously into the top 10, and then he's more useful as a domestique other wise. Pulling the peloton just so it doesn't go to hell and get dangerous, getting the GC favourites up front and out of danger, heaven forbid chasing a split or dangerous break that the OPQS captains don't make.

I don't rate the OPQS sprinters as winners, except Boonen.
 
Nov 11, 2010
3,387
1
0
Bert Grabsch is one weird rider. He can either do well in a time trial, or do really bad in them.
 
Mar 27, 2011
6,135
7
17,495
airstream said:
I think they can easily sacrifice Rojas this Tour. He can neither win the stage nor fight for maillot wert and is suited to any kind of team work very very bad. Alex, Juanjo, Arroyo, Costa, Kiry, Guti, Karpets, Plaza and Erviti. :)

I would take him as he rode well last year/ could win a stage this year. I would take out either Erviti or Plaza ( who might not have recovered to be the rider he once was ).
 
Dec 30, 2011
3,547
0
0
WillemS said:
Who's going to replace Andy S. at the tour?
Well there are 2 scenarios
1) This was only the provisional list so it is now done to 13 riders or so and therefore the team will be chosen from this list still.
2) Horner wasnt picked due to politics and will get called up on the pretense of replacing Schleck and therefore will get picked for the tour it would look very bad on the RSNT management though.

and..
3) Schleck will still be racing the tour
 
Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
4) They didn't pick Horner for the last 14 because they suspected that Andy won't be racing and Klöden would be the leader.
 
roundabout said:
4) They didn't pick Horner for the last 14 because they suspected that Andy won't be racing and Klöden would be the leader.

Is Andy that much better than Frank uphill that only Andy would be leader in front of Klodi?.. I think not. Frank is obviously the one to ride for in July.
 
Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
Frank is usually worse than Andy in time trials (especially long ones). Second argument is that Klöden seems to be given a free reign to prepare for the Tour: not asked to do the Giro, going slower than he can in the TdS.
 
Jul 3, 2009
18,948
5
22,485
Frank's only chance for a high overall result was if he managed to tag along with Andy on a couple of attacks. Whatever Andy would have lost against the clock, add another minute or two for Frank.

If Bruyneel thinks he's up to it, Klöden makes much more sense as leader.
 
What could ever justify Klöden as anything near captain after this season..? Not buying the 'free reign to prepare for the Tour'. I think, he's simply has topped it. Frank has already showed great form in Suisse. Klöden might be twice the TT'er but Frank is twice the climber as well.
 
Dec 28, 2011
110
0
0
DominicDecoco said:
What could ever justify Klöden as anything near captain after this season..? Not buying the 'free reign to prepare for the Tour'. I think, he's simply has topped it. Frank has already showed great form in Suisse. Klöden might be twice the TT'er but Frank is twice the climber as well.

Maybe Bruyneel could swap Frank and Andreas' race numbers before the TT?:eek:
 
Jan 2, 2010
395
0
0
TheArt said:
AG2R have revealed 4 riders who are certain: Roche, Peraud, Dupont and Cherel.

I'll have my fingers crossed for a Cherel stage win. He's been riding aggressively and missing out on the leader's jersey in Catalunya was terrible luck. Dupont was getting better during the Giro so maybe he'll be good? Peraud hasn't showed much lately but I know he's had a strange schedule with mountain biking.

I would expect Kadri and Bouet to make the selection?
 
Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
Will they take a sprinter? Sure, none of them can win, but Mondory/Ravard/Hinault would give them at least some presence in the sprints.
 
Nov 6, 2009
799
115
10,180
ansimi said:
I'll have my fingers crossed for a Cherel stage win. He's been riding aggressively and missing out on the leader's jersey in Catalunya was terrible luck. Dupont was getting better during the Giro so maybe he'll be good? Peraud hasn't showed much lately but I know he's had a strange schedule with mountain biking.

I would expect Kadri and Bouet to make the selection?

Agree with those two and then Nocentini should be certain I would have supposed. And also Riblon I would think despite him being bad in Dauphine. And finally I would guess Hinault for the 9. place then.
 
Apr 16, 2009
17,600
6,854
28,180
Frank Schleck as a leader makes better sense to me than Kloden. I just think that Kloden's time has passed already. Great domestique.

In fact Kloden feels comfortable in that domestique role. You can even trick him telling him he is a domestique and in case Frank has a bad day in the Tour Kloden might end up as the forced leader (2004 Tour).
 
May 20, 2009
8,934
7
17,495
Escarabajo said:
Frank Schleck as a leader makes better sense to me than Kloden. I just think that Kloden's time has passed already. Great domestique.
Either way it doesn't matter, they're 2nd tier riders at this point. They have no chance to win or podium.
 
Jan 22, 2011
2,840
1
0
cineteq said:
Either way it doesn't matter, they're 2nd tier riders at this point. They have no chance to win or podium.

Because neither one of them two has ever podiumed in the Tour before, right?
 
May 20, 2009
8,934
7
17,495
Fetisoff said:
Because neither one of them two has ever podiumed in the Tour before, right?
You seem to be focus in the past. Your Menchov comments corroborates it. What it matters is what have they done lately and which teams they're riding for.
 
Jul 28, 2010
2,274
0
0
I guess now I'd go with...

F. Schleck
J. Fuglsang
A. Kloden
M. Monfort
L. Gerdemann
J. Voigt
H. Zubeldia
F. Cancellara
T. Gallopin

Someone in another thread said Fuglsang deserves co-leadership, and I agree, but I just can't see him climbing with the top 10. Kloden should be the back-up plan.

Zubeldia should be free to go for his own chances, perhaps KOM? Voigt should be allowed to stage hunt every so often. I believe Gallopin should get to be on the team now as well.

Maybe swap Popovych for Gerdemann?