I am having trouble following what is happening here, but it appears that a WADA, USADA and CCN request to provide amnesty (limited?) for those who were willing to speak out to the UCIIC has somehow been transformed into a proposed full blown T&R process. To me these aren't the same thing. The first was to encourage those who wished to speak out about doping and UCI cover-ups while limiting the consequences, while the second is a very complicated and risky process involving the entire sport.
The first and obvious question is what organisation(s) are capable of managing the process - especially given that virtually all those involved are quasi-political or are structurally incapable of the task.
The next question is whether or not such a process could actually be beneficial. Personally I doubt that a T&R process will lead to the desired revolution. After all, we already know much about who did what and how - yet we remain stuck in a never-ending cycle of scandals, corruption, and incapability to slay the dragon. So what if we learn that Ferrari, Fuentes, Leinders, De Moral, etc. supplied and administered doping products. We know this already, yet they continue to do their damage almost unhindered. We know that Festina, t-mobile, USPS, Rabobank, etc. had team doping programs, yet this knowledge doesn't appear to stop Katusha, Astana, etc. from doing what they are doing.
What will a T&R commission really change?
Not to mention that it appears to be a pretext by the UCI to disband the "independent" commission that was intended to investigate their shady business. It now looks like this is a maneuver to avoid the truth from coming out, and maybe as a bonus to allow their financial backer Armstrong to latch onto an amnesty plan so he can continue to seduce his speedo clad groupies.