Re: Re:
How so? I've never been stranded on tyres with tubes. I just put a new tube in. The couple of major cuts and slashes I've had over the last 10 years would absolutely not have been sealed by any sort of sealant, and anyone riding behind me would have been sprayed with white goop. A $5 note as a boot, a new tube and I was good to go. I continue to remain unaware of any real reason why I would ride road tubeless.
(I also read last week of the existence of "stanimals" which apparently are lumps of hardened sealant that rattle around inside tubeless tyres. Who needs this?)
MWC said:Bustedknuckle said:MWC said:Bustedknuckle said:42x16ss said:Yet another reason to ride tubular![]()
RIGHT on and winkybiker above you..clinchers are for nancys.
Tubulars on everyday road bikes are for nostalgic geezers that wish it was still 1986.![]()
Nope, you probably think tubeless with tape/goop/valves are actually easier than tubulari.![]()
![]()
I set up tubeless, but the extra hassle has saved my a$$ on more than one occasion in the middle of absolutely nowhere.
How so? I've never been stranded on tyres with tubes. I just put a new tube in. The couple of major cuts and slashes I've had over the last 10 years would absolutely not have been sealed by any sort of sealant, and anyone riding behind me would have been sprayed with white goop. A $5 note as a boot, a new tube and I was good to go. I continue to remain unaware of any real reason why I would ride road tubeless.
(I also read last week of the existence of "stanimals" which apparently are lumps of hardened sealant that rattle around inside tubeless tyres. Who needs this?)