Well few takers. So to answer my own question, the sport is at a vulnerable crossroads. Widespread carnage hurts an already damaged sport. Time to circle the wagons again… The Armstrong news cannot be ignored. It is too big a story. There are some bombshells in Tyler's testimony, but I doubt it will go anywhere now. Which is bad news for the clinicians.
Big money drove the USPS machine and Armstrong's to me is the classic example of big fame being handed to a young and willing athlete who's could not control self-destructive behavior especially the desire for more in the comeback. Such is fame. Most of the press never seemed interested in this angle. The arrival of EPO added to it's heights of distruction, but there is the chance that his fall could turn things around. Despite it all.
I still don't agree with the "plea deal" method in which this was achieved. Although those not signed to USADA have no worries. For the rest, such a standard could lead to people being outed for less than honest reasons by those just as guilty. Let's hope not.
As far as the way stories are played by the press here and there. It pays to be well read if you have the time as many that post here are. I don't always have the time. Differences in reporting will always exist so I am not jumping on one or the others head here, but I could not pass this one up.
CN buried the story in my opinion. VN played it a little longer and better in this case. New news here today, and it all rolls on. VN now with a little egg on the face for reporting from "a source" that the feds "not likely" to join the whistle blower case. They will never trust that source again.
A published transcript of Tyler's testimony would be nice. Any takers?
Big money drove the USPS machine and Armstrong's to me is the classic example of big fame being handed to a young and willing athlete who's could not control self-destructive behavior especially the desire for more in the comeback. Such is fame. Most of the press never seemed interested in this angle. The arrival of EPO added to it's heights of distruction, but there is the chance that his fall could turn things around. Despite it all.
I still don't agree with the "plea deal" method in which this was achieved. Although those not signed to USADA have no worries. For the rest, such a standard could lead to people being outed for less than honest reasons by those just as guilty. Let's hope not.
As far as the way stories are played by the press here and there. It pays to be well read if you have the time as many that post here are. I don't always have the time. Differences in reporting will always exist so I am not jumping on one or the others head here, but I could not pass this one up.
CN buried the story in my opinion. VN played it a little longer and better in this case. New news here today, and it all rolls on. VN now with a little egg on the face for reporting from "a source" that the feds "not likely" to join the whistle blower case. They will never trust that source again.
A published transcript of Tyler's testimony would be nice. Any takers?