Men's U23 races and talents

Page 87 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I have to ask, does anybody know how or which metric is being used to round off times? I'm pretty sure numbers 0 to 4 are mathematically rounded off downward, while 5 to 9 is rounded off upward.

According to PCS, these are the times for GC:


while they should be (assuming PCS stage results are correct):

The method of rounding down to the Full second in Overall time, as it‘s done in road stages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: search
I have to ask, does anybody know how or which metric is being used to round off times? I'm pretty sure numbers 0 to 4 are mathematically rounded off downward, while 5 to 9 is rounded off upward.

According to PCS, these are the times for GC:


while they should be (assuming PCS stage results are correct):

They got some right.
 
I was afraid of that. Since riders' times are only relevant in reference to each other. Especially in a TT. It kind of defeats the purpose. You could now lose by 0.001 seconds and get slapped with 1 second in GC, depending on the overall time.
That would still be the case if said thousandth of a second took the fraction above 0.5. It just shifts the critical point.
In a race for which eligibility is determined by a truncated age criterion, we can't really complain about truncation rather than rounding to nearest integer for times.
 
That would still be the case if said thousandth of a second took the fraction above 0.5. It just shifts the critical point.
In a race for which eligibility is determined by a truncated age criterion, we can't really complain about truncation rather than rounding to nearest integer for times.
When the relative time differences between riders were to be used as measuring stick with the winner as the reference, you will never have the runner up finish 0.001 s behind the winner and be set back an entire second, which now could be the case depending on the overall time. You could argue that for riders further down, it would just shift the point, that's true.
 
Are we seeing the same phenomenon as in Giro Next Gen that the teams are not able to control the race so big break aways go off and manages to stay away. In the Giro Next Gen it had direct impacts on the overall race since the top 4 all gained time by being in big break aways.

In todays stage it's Dalby and Turconi that seem to be the biggest threats to the overall out of the 20 riders, unless there is a good climber I didn't recognize.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SafeBet