Jesper Philepsen starting off the season with relegation lol.
Apparently the reason Molano crashed was that his back tire violently exploded, while he was holding onto a bidon. Another victim of tubeless tires.
How does a tyre explode with only 70 psi or whatever?????Apparently the reason Molano crashed was that his back tire violently exploded, while he was holding onto a bidon. Another victim of tubeless tires.
View: https://x.com/lucasaganronald/status/1891470836013404191
That's allowed under UCI rules?!EDIT: well nvm, apparently everyone (apart from Milan) can just choose when they start. Almost all the GC candidates early again (just like last year). Annoying.
Have you ever seen a tubeless tire at 60-80 psi suddenly decompress (lose its seal)? It is pretty much an instant tire off the rim situation. On the road and going over 40 kph would be a touch explosiveHow does a tyre explode with only 70 psi or whatever?????
You can clearly see the tubeless sealant spraying out. It's very typical of these kind of blowouts.did this happen, though? Can't see any of it in the video, and Lukas is not a particularly trustworthy source
It's the first year with the system in force. Better to start gentle and then after a year or two adjust the sanctions.That's allowed under UCI rules?!
Speaking of bad UCI rules, what's the point of a yellow card system if you need to accumulate them faster than Vingegaard's wife accumulates calls from her husband for them to mean anything AND you're not even going to hand them out for cases like Philipsen's today? Would be surprised if even a single rider faces a suspension all year because of them.
That's allowed under UCI rules?!
Speaking of bad UCI rules, what's the point of a yellow card system if you need to accumulate them faster than Vingegaard's wife accumulates calls from her husband for them to mean anything AND you're not even going to hand them out for cases like Philipsen's today? Would be surprised if even a single rider faces a suspension all year because of them.
no, it's not:That's allowed under UCI rules?!
So basically, the UCI rules are like Calvinball. Great.no, it's not:
There's a "The starting order shall be determined by the organiser of the event in accordance with objective criteria" rule, but that only applies to one day races, as "The starting order of time trial stages during stage races shall be governed by article 2.6.023", which says:
"The starting order for individual time trial stages shall be the reverse order of the general time classification. Nevertheless, the commissaires panel may modify that order to avoid two riders of the same team riding consecutively."
But they did the same last year already, so UCI seems to be fine with it. Not that it makes much of a difference, but the teams had to decide their order yesterday already, btw.
This is the same organisation that changed the rules about 48 hours before their own official World Championships. I wouldn't expect anything less.So basically, the UCI rules are like Calvinball. Great.
There's the representation of the thing (e.g. words in a document) and then there's the reality of the thing (e.g. what gets enforced). Rules are not their representation, but their reality.So basically, the UCI rules are like Calvinball. Great.
well, stage 2 is an ITT or should I say a delayed extended prologue. Maybe Price can show us something or perhaps Tarling.