- May 26, 2010
- 28,143
- 5
- 0
BillytheKid said:![]()
...an unnamed source...shocking![]()
Wow Lance has put on a few pounds.......
BillytheKid said:![]()
...an unnamed source...shocking![]()
The Plediadian said:This sounds so much like FOX news, Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, or the Tea Party.
I do not think even the radical right who want to Lop off Barbara Boxers head, would even want to touch a sporting fraud controversy.
I think in the USA sports heroes are saints to the public.
DirtyWorks said:
Why not?
From Wonderboy's side, money/power talks. The head of a law enforcement department didn't get there by doing a good job. They got there because they wanted the status/power/influence. So Fabiani whispers in the appropriate people's ear some combination of things that would better their career, or if that doesn't work, things that could end their career. Nothing illegal about it.
From the investigators side, they don't work in a Democratic institution. Just the opposite, it's top-down power and control. Your superior says it ends, well then that's it. And if the investigator doesn't like it, well then they are free to work somewhere else where they will be happier.
Externally, it stinks. Internal to whatever system the investigator works, it just is. I'm not sure what the solution to this problem is.
LarryBudMelman said:You'd think this would be catnip for CBS, the WSJ, Daily News, and Sports Illustrated.
I would think the WSJ would have a field day connecting all these Clintonites to Obama and his justice dept. although I think conservatives, with a few exceptions like Scott, have been very critical of the investigation.
If they were politically astute at all they'd do a 180 and start hammering the corruption angle in the Obama Department of Justice. They could nail Boxer, Breuer and Obama on this. I think I may call my parents Rep. Peter King and put some ideas in that idiot's head.
Race Radio said:Not a sporting fraud controversy....but a rich, famous person getting special treatment because of political connections.
Yeah, nobody cares about that stuff.
Race Radio said:Not a sporting fraud controversy....but a rich, famous person getting special treatment because of political connections.
Yeah, nobody cares about that stuff.
Race Radio said:You guys should have got your shots in when you had a chance. Too late
It will be come increasingly clear that the case was dropped despite overwhelming evidence of guilt. I expect that this story will continue to develop with even more media outlets explore not only why ONE man chose to ignore a mountain of evidence and let a bunch of crooks off the hook but the pressure put on him to do so.
While the rats are scrambling to cover their tracks I expect the full story of how they achieved this to be exposed. Sometimes the cover-up is worse then the crime
Of course there is still the Qui Tam case. The risk for Armstrong, and his friends, is huge. Those type of cases are usually kept secret until trial.....but oh what a trial that will be. I can understand why Wonderboy is selling the jet, settling is the smartest move
Of course the USADA case is going forward, full steam, guns blazing.
Over? nope
Disagree. The information collected by the Grand Jury is locked up tight. I have serious doubts WADA will get access to any of it. I want that to be different like many. Really. But, getting the investigation shut down without an explanation seemingly surprising the people running the investigation was a display of naked power. That same power will keep the information locked up tight.Maxiton said:The case is too public, too out there, the indications of corruption too obvious, especially this close to the election. The democrats have too much to lose and too little to gain to allow this appearance of corruption.
Maxiton said:On top of which, these federal investigators are for the most part dedicated individuals who will know better than most of us what is going on here, and who won't appreciate it. These people don't like to think that they live in a banana republic. And for the most part they don't.
That's why not.
MarkvW said:Yeah, Yeah. I get it. Somehow Lance's beating the rap is really a step forward in the process that will ultimately have Lance held accountable . . ..
What I am seeing is undisciplined cops who don't like the decision of the United States Attorney General and are willing to violate GJ secrecy rules to further their own agenda. I've reserved judgment on Novitsky, even after he violated the federal judge's order in the BALCO case, but now, if he's talking about a secret investigation--he's just a dirtbag like Armstrong.
A world of pressure is going to come down on the leaky federal ship. People go to jail and careers are destroyed when the GJ secrecy rules are violated. Look at the dirtbag defense lawyer convicted in Balco. If RR wants to cheerlead the violation of GJ secrecy rules, he can also cheerlead the implosion of a federal investigator's career.
There has been a multimillion dollar secret investigation using compelled witnesses, and Armstrong has had NO opportunity to defend himself. Now the feds are selectively leaking information from that investigation to hurt Armstrong. Even you can see how unfair that is! And if you are too blinded by hate to see that, think about it this way: this kind of development is a cataclysmic multiorgasmic wet dream for Armstrong's attorneys.
Do you think the federal judge is going to tolerate a loose cannon federal investigator? Could a federal judge just lock up the GJ information to prevent further harm to GJ witnesses (like USADA)? The bottom line is that the federal government is now treating Lance Armstrong unfairly and federal judges have awesomely broad powers to protect people who have been treated unfairly.
I'm angry because this leaking could jeopardize information sharing with USADA and WADA. It is so insanely stupid, I can't describe it in words.
Cops disagree with prosecutors over charging decisions all the time.
There has been a multimillion dollar secret investigation using compelled witnesses, and Armstrong has had NO opportunity to defend himself. Now the feds are selectively leaking information from that investigation to hurt Armstrong. Even you can see how unfair that is! And if you are too blinded by hate to see that, think about it this way: this kind of development is a cataclysmic multiorgasmic wet dream for Armstrong's attorneys
I'm angry because this leaking could jeopardize information sharing with USADA and WADA. It is so insanely stupid, I can't describe it in words.
For someone that is quick to call the wild claims of others, you have just made more and grander claims than most. The prognostications are amazing.MarkvW said:What I am seeing is undisciplined cops who don't like the decision of the United States Attorney General ... blah blah blah...
Velodude said:Look I am on this side of the fence
Now I am on the other side.
thehog said:If anything can someone indict Liggett for crimes against commentary?
DirtyWorks said:For someone that is quick to call the wild claims of others, you have just made more and grander claims than most. The prognostications are amazing.
How about providing some facts to back up some of your claims? Or, are we just supposed to agree with you because you think you are right?
LarryBudMelman said:I'm calling the Conservatives, Marco Rubio, Allen West, regarding corruption in Obama's Dept of Justice. They're eating it up...
MarkvW said:Read the CN article. The investigators are talking.
DirtyWorks said:The custom tailored Obama scandal you ordered is finally here:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/t...red-obama-scandal-you-ordered-is-finally-here
DirtyWorks said:Really? Again, you are very quick to call weak arguments out and now you would have readers believe your wild accusations and fantastic predictions based on the tiniest sliver of fact?
DirtyWorks said:If the current administration gets sensitive about having the how/why the investigation evaporated story, they'd threaten pulling WSJ/CBS/etc media access and so that would kill the story. You have no idea how negotiated most of the news is in order for it to appear in mainstream media.
With Fabiani running around, defending Wonderboy, a story that looks unfavorably at a government institution, regardless of the administration in office would likely never see the light of day.
MarkvW said:Yeah, Yeah. I get it. Somehow Lance's beating the rap is really a step forward in the process that will ultimately have Lance held accountable . . ..
What I am seeing is undisciplined cops who don't like the decision of the United States Attorney General and are willing to violate GJ secrecy rules to further their own agenda. I've reserved judgment on Novitsky, even after he violated the federal judge's order in the BALCO case, but now, if he's talking about a secret investigation--he's just a dirtbag like Armstrong.
A world of pressure is going to come down on the leaky federal ship. People go to jail and careers are destroyed when the GJ secrecy rules are violated. Look at the dirtbag defense lawyer convicted in Balco. If RR wants to cheerlead the violation of GJ secrecy rules, he can also cheerlead the implosion of a federal investigator's career.
There has been a multimillion dollar secret investigation using compelled witnesses, and Armstrong has had NO opportunity to defend himself. Now the feds are selectively leaking information from that investigation to hurt Armstrong. Even you can see how unfair that is! And if you are too blinded by hate to see that, think about it this way: this kind of development is a cataclysmic multiorgasmic wet dream for Armstrong's attorneys.
Do you think the federal judge is going to tolerate a loose cannon federal investigator? Could a federal judge just lock up the GJ information to prevent further harm to GJ witnesses (like USADA)? The bottom line is that the federal government is now treating Lance Armstrong unfairly and federal judges have awesomely broad powers to protect people who have been treated unfairly.
I'm angry because this leaking could jeopardize information sharing with USADA and WADA. It is so insanely stupid, I can't describe it in words.
Cops disagree with prosecutors over charging decisions all the time.
MarkvW said:Read the CN article. The investigators are talking.
Velodude said:No there are leaks from persons who have knowledge of the investigation. Could be a file clerk.
The Pentagon Papers and Deep Throat's leaks to the Washington Post had huge impacts and forced beneficial changes to government behavior.
Leaks are not all bad and self serving.