I think this prosecution, although plausible of a convection, but currently absent of it, does little to address the PED problem as a whole in sport. I'd rather see better and broader testing going forward. I believe the PED problem is wide-spread in sport and tolerated by governing bodies to a degree in an unjust manner.
This only my opinion.
An example of this would be the contrast between American Baseball's somewhat weak penalty system until the third positve and lack of testing compared to cycling. All of sport should adopt the same testing procedures going forward.
I do wonder about the politics of Amrstrong case.
Physique of athletes have radically change in the past 30 years. File footage of previous eras can visably attest to this. Scientific analysis of this footage would, in my opinion, back up my claim.
It strikes me as ironic, that certain athletes find themselves in the crosshairs while others who achieve unusual good results or longevity are not in the spotlight.
I am not going to argue this anymore, but I do not look forward to more reporting on this story from "unamed sources close to the investigation."
If the process goes forward without such frothing at the mouth and fingure pointing, then it will be fair and just.
Trial by public opinion is always a bad deal. Where some feel strongly about this, I am ambivelant, because I it is more important to apply meassures going forward rather than targeting selective individuals of suspicion of the past.
But the die has been cast again, and the legal system will go forward against the singular instead of the system behind the problem.
Nipping at a bit of skin cancer will never cure the disease.