- Jul 12, 2012
- 649
- 0
- 0
131313 said:you did better than I did. 10 seconds in and I couldn't get past the hat...
I would soon sit thru an entire replay of this year's Tour de Bore...
131313 said:you did better than I did. 10 seconds in and I couldn't get past the hat...
BullsFan22 said:
BullsFan22 said:
MarkvW said:Most informed spectators expect an early dismissal of Armstrong's lawsuit. That means that Armstrong will have decide whether or not to contest USADA in the arbitration.
Lance has already said (a) that he won't fight; and (b) that he has no chance of winning the arbitration (he said that in his complaint). Is he going to spend more money to fight the arbitration?
I don't think Lance is rational about this. I think he's going to keep fighting and keep throwing money at this--even after all the facts about the USPS conspiracy become public.
More Strides than Rides said:Are there any important dates/deadlines coming up? When will/should there be a ruling on Lance's lawsuit, and when would arbitration take place? I'm just not sure about the time frame here
MarkvW said:Most informed spectators expect an early dismissal of Armstrong's lawsuit. That means that Armstrong will have decide whether or not to contest USADA in the arbitration.
Kender said:I'm surprised it hasn't already. The USADA Jurisdiction stuff was rubbish. Judge Sparks obviously wants to make sure everything is in order, and fair enough. The implications of what could happen are big in relation to USADA being able to fullfil their function.
thehog said:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/mcquaid-disavows-uci-responsibility-in-armstrong-case
The UCI dropping the ball?
Race Radio said:Lets see.
UCI in charge of testing Armstrong for 15 of the 17 years he raced as a Pro....but it is WADA's fault
Cyclingnews: Because I'm with Cyclingnews and it's my job to be a downer, I would like you to comment on an article in the New York Daily News (by Nathaniel Vinton), who wrote, "If USADA’s case against Armstrong is valid, then professional cycling has been the victim of breathtaking corruption", bigger than any other sport. If USADA can prove its case, how does that impact the UCI, cycling in the Olympics - if a sport is going to get voted out of the Games in Rio...
Race Radio said:Lets see.
UCI in charge of testing Armstrong for 15 of the 17 years he raced as a Pro....but it is WADA's fault
thehog said:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/mcquaid-disavows-uci-responsibility-in-armstrong-case
The UCI dropping the ball?
How does the UCI take such pride in being at the forefront of anti-doping technology with the biological passport and then push all of that back on WADA?
thehog said:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/mcquaid-disavows-uci-responsibility-in-armstrong-case
The UCI dropping the ball?
the big ring said:Someone asked a hard question - and without a yellow jersey on, PMcQuack can't call the asker a F*ing W*er and drop the microphone and storm out.
That interviewer has cajones.
thehog said:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/mcquaid-disavows-uci-responsibility-in-armstrong-case
The UCI dropping the ball?
Oldman said:Pretending he wasn't at the game...