thehog said:
McQuaid would prefer it all just to go away and be handled by USADA. If the UCI handle the case he’ll be under extreme pressure to find a resolution. He can already see that it’s obvious of the extreme bias. Future CAS cases with cite the Armstrong case. Other athletes will claim jurisdiction if successful. It’s a no win for McQuaid. He needs to clear it off his desk immediately. Pat wants to hang out with Royals. He has no time for this. Sadly he’ll have to deal with it sooner than he thinks. 2013 re-election is just around the corner and he needs to hold on to his company apartment, travel and entertainment budgets and beer fridge.
Our friend here is Armstrong. He actually holds the aces. His defense is to admit to doping. But only because there was mass doping during his era and that the governing body allowed it to occur and made positive tests disappear with donation(s). He could make himself look really good at the end of it. Tell the hearing that he wanted to be clean but there was no hope with the UCI blind eye treatment of dopers. He could smash the UCI to pieces and probably hang on to his 7 titles. He could point to all the other riders who’ve been caught up in drug scandals but never tested positive because the UCI enabled doping. (I’d also throw some cancer stuff in here as well).
He has more chance with this strategy than pretending to be clean. Lance cannot win by pretending to be clean.
McQuaid/UCI would be powerless to defend it. No chance he could suggest Armstrong made it all up. No possible. Armstrong could show the donation talk about the meetings with lab directors etc.
Question is. Who would you support? Lance or the UCI?
A very good question!
Lance has suffered a lot over these past two years - by his own admission - and he must really be at his wits end right now. I actually feel sorry for the people around him, his GF and family. I kind of feel sorry for him, too, in a way.
Meanwhile, the UCI carry on their merry way, annointing this or that rider as the protected one and reaping a windfall, all the while hobnobbing with Europe's inbred, erstwhile nazi-sympathising aristocracy and networking with other assorted crocodiles.
When the Feds ended their investigation I was disappointed that the UCI wouldn't be called to account, more than anything else. They're the enablers here. The likes of Lance come and go, but the fat administrators of the UCI milk each new generation's sacred cow.
If the UCI's current administration can be brought down it is a far-more useful event for the good of the sport and its future. If Lance follows the mea culpa you described and thereby assumes a submissive position to the corrupt UCI, he actually takes a double-hit: his career is exposed as a lie and he is not the sui generis and all-powerful hero he likes to promote himself as. He would be admitting he served higher masters, and that is something his ego cannot tolerate. He'd no longer be the solo hero - a foundational element of the myth itself - and instead be the disposable performing puppet of a insidious organisation.
That's gotta hurt.
If it brings McQuaid, Verbruggen et al to justice, I'm all for Lance. I see it in his eyes. He suffers for who he is, and now it's the turn for those nasty pieces of work in bespoke suits.
They're Drs Frankenstein; he's just the monster they created.