USADA - Armstrong

Page 395 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.

LauraLyn

BANNED
Jul 13, 2012
594
0
0
fatandfast said:
So the dream is alive?
That Lance was employed at a company that didn't follow US labor laws?
Is the dream alive that the governing body of his sport allows cheaters to continue...if the reason is really,really good?
If these guys broke the rules and get a deferred so that they can promote federation races and make money,I hope the court weighs that

Yups. After USADA arbitration. After CAS. After a Swiss appeal.

Thus, not much of a dream.
 
Jul 13, 2012
59
0
0
LauraLyn said:
No.

You cannot challenge in Federal court and then pretend it doesn't matter.

If he doesn't arbitrate, it means he has been abandoned.

When the Federal court dismisses that challenge without prejudice, and without deciding on the issue of whether or not USADA has a right to sanction you, you can certainly still pretend the sanction doesn't matter.
 
Jul 14, 2009
2,498
0
0
Race Radio said:
The 300000 cycling fans dropped him years ago. The millions of cancer groupies are still willing dupes.

Was he to maintain a fan base while not racing? Dropped from his 140 character money maker?
He is an icon..to me no.to you no.but have seen yellow bracelets in Olympic coverage..little league world series..why are they not getting the message
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
LauraLyn said:
No.

You cannot challenge in Federal court and then pretend it doesn't matter.

If he doesn't arbitrate, it means he has been abandoned.

He will pretend the process is rigged and he cannot get a fair arbitration hearing
 
QuickStepper said:
Armstrong was only an employee of the teams he raced for and whose jerseys he wore when he raced.

Yes, maybe, no. He had/has a role in the Tailwind corporation and Capital Sports and Entertainment and effectively called the shots from what has been gathered.

How that works out legally in regards to his status as the legal definition of an "employee" I don't have a clue. Colloquially, he was at minimum one of the bosses.
 
fatandfast said:
Was he to maintain a fan base while not racing? Dropped from his 140 character money maker?
He is an icon..to me no.to you no.but have seen yellow bracelets in Olympic coverage..little league world series..why are they not getting the message

They can't/don't read? Most people get their news through habitual sources and frankly; we are in our own little world here.
Speaking to a former racer, cancer survivor and Lance idolator (still has the poster down in his training room); he treated any information I presented as heresay and was skeptical when shown Mr. Ashendon's comments and other developments. He is normally a rational individual but it's clear you cannot discount the level of internal faith he gained during his cancer treatment.
My departed Dad was leery of icons and he and his oncologist discussed the pending developments over a year ago. That resulted in the doctor removing his yellow band as did everyone in his unit. They just didn't have the time to follow up on the news and the symbol had become so generalized as a sign of support. Not as simple as: Lance is evil or good.
 
MacRoadie said:
From "never cheated, never doped, passed 600 tests" to this:

Originally Posted by fatandfast
That Lance was employed at a company that didn't follow US labor laws?

Post of the day! Regardless of what may come later on. Maybe it's time to make some yellow anodized tin foil hats for the faithful.
 
frenchfry said:
I just can't see him wanting to go to arbitration with USADA. He knows they have enough on him to do major damage, and the endless witness appearances would destroy his public image. No way he can discredit more than 10 witnesses, especially when their stories corroborate.

Not long to wait to find out what the next move will be.

Spot on!!! It's a shame lance can't comprehend any of this. When you've lived in Denial land for so long, you just can't think straight. i think it's time he come face to face w/reality and realize: he's BUSTED!!!!
 
Jul 14, 2009
2,498
0
0
Oldman I go with Dad. Lance is the greatest racer of our generation. I am amused that our paths crossed at Ocean Beach bike shop,wed rides, Zigguratt and other informal rides . He is no guru. The guy was good when he raced Kenny Souza at his start. He trained with Tinley,Molina and Scott to start.

The guy is was extraordinary from his beginning

If he upended bike racing fine. But doping? No dope in the NHL,NBA,FIFA teams?
This is the UCI and it's smallness. Dopers are all over.from drisage to world leaders trying to look viral to the voter..leave my sport alone..give everyone Rubios and this is done.
 
As to the "employee" question, that would depend on his contract. In Europe, most pro cyclists are most certainly not employees, but are free-lancers who contract to provide a service.

Obviously I do not know whether this applies to Amstrong, but it is just as possible as the application of US labour laws. Especially since his last few teams were not US based.

Susan
 
May 21, 2010
808
0
0
86TDFWinner said:
Spot on!!! It's a shame lance can't comprehend any of this. When you've lived in Denial land for so long, you just can't think straight. i think it's time he come face to face w/reality and realize: he's BUSTED!!!!

I dont think hes in denial land, more "string this out while I squirrel away these ill gotten millions" land.
 
Susan Westemeyer said:
As to the "employee" question, that would depend on his contract. In Europe, most pro cyclists are most certainly not employees, but are free-lancers who contract to provide a service.

Obviously I do not know whether this applies to Amstrong, but it is just as possible as the application of US labour laws. Especially since his last few teams were not US based.

Susan

Right! Add jurisdiction into the question of employee status and there's an even bigger puzzle to sort out.
 
Jun 16, 2009
60
0
0
fatandfast said:
And this is not true?

The only "evidence" Armstrong has offered is that the USADA has a very high success rate. What do they call a DA or a defense lawyer with a high success rate? GOOD. The USADA ONLY CONTESTS EGREGIOUS CASES THEY ARE LIKELY TO WIN ON THE EVIDENCE.

M
 
May 10, 2011
247
0
0
fatandfast said:
Was he to maintain a fan base while not racing? Dropped from his 140 character money maker?
He is an icon..to me no.to you no.but have seen yellow bracelets in Olympic coverage..little league world series..why are they not getting the message


I think they aren't getting the message because in the US, the mainstream sports media really doesn't care about cycling very much. Should this go to arbitration, I'd expect some stuff to hit the front pages, but most of these bigger articles we've been getting lately haven't so much as scratched the front page of ESPN's website.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
fatandfast said:
Oldman I go with Dad. Lance is the greatest racer of our generation. I am amused that our paths crossed at Ocean Beach bike shop,wed rides, Zigguratt and other informal rides . He is no guru. The guy was good when he raced Kenny Souza at his start. He trained with Tinley,Molina and Scott to start.

The guy is was extraordinary from his beginning

If he upended bike racing fine. But doping? No dope in the NHL,NBA,FIFA teams?
This is the UCI and it's smallness. Dopers are all over.from drisage to world leaders trying to look viral to the voter..leave my sport alone..give everyone Rubios and this is done.

You weren't spewing this stuff a few years ago! He was clean then and the greatest. Now he is dirty and still the greatest. Cant be both!

Dopers are cheats. Nothing great about them only to sad people who live the life of lies themselves.
 
Susan Westemeyer said:
As to the "employee" question, that would depend on his contract. In Europe, most pro cyclists are most certainly not employees, but are free-lancers who contract to provide a service.

Obviously I do not know whether this applies to Amstrong, but it is just as possible as the application of US labour laws. Especially since his last few teams were not US based.

Susan

Read: Bosman ruling: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosman_ruling

In EU - restraint of trade.
 

the big ring

BANNED
Jul 28, 2009
2,135
0
0
Weapons of @ss Destruction said:
It's actually 1/2 by his choosing, since 1/2 of one of the other 1/3s is a shared selection. In other words, Team LA and USADA participate exactly equally in the selection of arbiters.

I didn't consider 1/2 of a person as a valid construct, but agreed, he does have a say in the third person, but directly chooses the first one.

Either way, it's fair.
 
Mar 19, 2009
832
0
0
LauraLyn said:
Yups. After USADA arbitration. After CAS. After a Swiss appeal.

Thus, not much of a dream.

It's important to note that it's rare for the Swiss Federal Tribunal to actually hear an appeal of a CAS verdict. It's happened fewer than 10 times in CAS history.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.