straydog said:Mas...you are slipping....have a look at all of LA's blood tests from 09-10, not just California....USADA did plenty.
so is usada incompetent (couldn't catch him) or complicit (wouldn't catch him)?
boggles the mind
straydog said:Mas...you are slipping....have a look at all of LA's blood tests from 09-10, not just California....USADA did plenty.
straydog said:Mas...you are slipping....have a look at all of LA's blood tests from 09-10, not just California....USADA did plenty.
patricknd said:so is usada incompetent (couldn't catch him) or complicit (wouldn't catch him)?
boggles the mind![]()
straydog said:I feel so special.
As to MewMewmew's assertion that LA is reminding WTC, as a means of some kind of intimidation. Your logic is absurd. Maybe do a bit of reading on why Messick asked LA to race Ironman events. And then maybe have a look at the resulting media attention that has been brought to Ironman as a result of his participation and the ensuing sponsor dollars pouring into the coffers. Do you really think LA is ringing up the WTC saying " If you ban me, you are going to lose so much money?" Really? you think that? Like, really?
It is much more likely that WTC are desperately looking at their doping rules to try and find a way to not have to suspend him. I sincerely doubt he is having to do any begging.
patricknd said:so is usada incompetent (couldn't catch him) or complicit (wouldn't catch him)?
boggles the mind![]()
straydog said:ha ha....+1. Couldn't have said it better myself
Maybe USADA could only afford interns to do the testing in 09-10![]()
straydog said:well clearly the first option is true, judging by the humungous fishing trip they are going on with their sanctions. Any poker player will tell you, if you have Aces pre flop you don't raise all in, you try and cook the pot, sucker the money in. Anyone who does is most likely bluffing.
ChrisE said:Neither, my friend.
Ferrari's magic conspiracy dust was spread all over the testing terrain, making the USADA's task impossible you see.
I see vortex has pointed out USADA tested him 17 times from 08-10. All of those apparently didn't show manipulation, all magic conspiracy like. Or, did they show manipulation, and it just took the public pressure from FL to kick them in the jimmies, and dilute the magic Ferrari dust?![]()
Amazing how the UCI couldn't see what USADA see.Lance Armstrongs doping is further evidenced by the data from the blood collections obtained by the UCI from Lance Armstrong in 2009 and 2010.
ChrisE said:Neither, my friend.
Ferrari's magic conspiracy dust was spread all over the testing terrain, making the USADA's task impossible you see.
I see vortex has pointed out USADA tested him 17 times from 08-10. All of those apparently didn't show manipulation, all magic conspiracy like. Or, did they show manipulation, and it just took the public pressure from FL to kick them in the jimmies, and dilute the magic Ferrari dust?![]()
Dr. Maserati said:17 tests in total from 2008 - 2010, wouldn't call that plenty.
Scott SoCal said:But Lance will get help from former minion Jamie Burrow. So he's got a leg up.
What's the appearance fee for an Italian GF?
WADA has received complaints in recent months from several individuals and representatives of antidoping organizations who have raised concerns about the UCI's oversight.
This person said antidoping officials are particularly concerned about the status of five professional riders who were flagged for doping in December but have not yet been sanctioned by the UCI. The riders, whose names are known only to the UCI, were determined to be doping by an independent committee of nine scientists and experts that was appointed by the UCI to review data from blood and urine tests.
Dr. Maserati said:Hi Chris,
Like Straydog you need to read the letter as again it is explained in it:
Amazing how the UCI couldn't see what USADA see.
17 tests in total from 2008 - 2010, wouldn't call that plenty
The organization is charged with managing the anti-doping program for U.S. Olympic, Paralympic, Pan-American and ParaPan American sport. Its work includes in-competition and out-of-competition testing, the results management and adjudication process....
Scott SoCal said:Thanks. I forgot that De Moral was the doctor that backdated the Cortico TUE back in 1999.
krebs303 said:Here in English
http://www.dopeology.org/people/Lance_Armstrong/
Hi Chris,ChrisE said:Ooops vortex. In response to straydog saying "USADA did plenty" of testing, you replied with this:
I live back in the woods you see, the woman and the kids and the dog and me. So, I'm not too smart. But it seems now you say only UCI did testing and only the USADA could see the evil values. Are you caught up in one of your whirlpools?
Anyway, wiki says this about USADA:
USADA did indeed do testing on Armstrong, in fact one time when they made a surprise vist Lance pretended to not be there, wonder why.ChrisE said:So, WTF were they doing for all those dark years when LA was depriving rightful winners like Beloki, JU, Basso etc from their clean glory?
Were they too busy wiping the magic Ferrari doping concealment conspiracy dust off of their labcoats? Or, did they jump in the Delorean and see this testing will not be required when LA ****es off FL?![]()
Moose McKnuckles said:I bet Lance would settle for Simeoni's liver and a nice Chianti.
Scott SoCal said:Man, I just love SOL references.![]()
Dr. Maserati said:17 tests in total from 2008 - 2010, wouldn't call that plenty.
Moose McKnuckles said:Front page CNN. Opinion: "Don't forgive Lance Armstrong"
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/15/opinion/pearlman-lance-armstrong/index.html?hpt=hp_t3
I think people will realize that this guy made a mint from selling false hope to cancer victims, which places him in a whole different circle of dopers.
patricknd said:i'm not sure if i should be talking to you, you are on the dirtyworks ignore list![]()
straydog said:plenty enough to be able to ascertain values consistent with manipulation surely? ?Just, obviously, really really slowly.
It's a little strange that you suggest we not reply to those members, but you advertise their names in your signature block. That is like waving a flag, it gives them more attention than does a discussion. Besides, in my opinion half of those guys add some value to this place.DirtyWorks said:Think of it like a Public Service Announcement! Stop replying to those idi0ts. They crush any legitimate discussion. Which, I guess is the point.
You'll notice MarkVW is not on there. Every once in a while he has come up with a legitimate counterpoint.
