Re:
What? If any rider wins primarily through the misfortune of others, then he won primarily through the misfortune of others. If any rider is beaten, for reasons other than some freak bad luck, then it is evidence that the rider is at least as of that moment a lesser rider at that discipline. Nibali isn't singled out in that regard. That said, I do think that people tend to give riders too much credit for winning by being the strongest physically and not enough for winning because of being smart ,brave and ruthless. Nibali, the wily old dog, does get short changed there.
Durden93 said:Noibali can't win on this forum. If he wins due to an opponent's misfortune, it is discredited. If he doesn't win he's considered a lesser GT rider.
What? If any rider wins primarily through the misfortune of others, then he won primarily through the misfortune of others. If any rider is beaten, for reasons other than some freak bad luck, then it is evidence that the rider is at least as of that moment a lesser rider at that discipline. Nibali isn't singled out in that regard. That said, I do think that people tend to give riders too much credit for winning by being the strongest physically and not enough for winning because of being smart ,brave and ruthless. Nibali, the wily old dog, does get short changed there.