Re: Re:
Hi. I have pointed out several times that I am grouping him with other GT riders because that is who you would naturally compare him to. I have also pointed out that I am judging him on his whole palmares compared to others whole palmares, that is what matters to me. I have not in any way said Nibali should be top favourite in ANY race, if that's what you read into my posts then I'm sorry.
As a more general point I'll refer to Rollthedice:
It seems that at times you can't be a fan of another GT rider on this forum unless you couch everything in "but so and so is better at this and that" kind of language. Well no. This is the Nibali thread and yet every time someone wants to say how much they enjoy his riding, like it when he wins etc. someone has to come in and bring up Mr. Boring. I don't agree with them. I don't think Mr. Boring is half the rider Nibali is and I see Nibali as a true cyclist who can challenge on everything but a pan flat course and even then I wouldn't put it past him. Guys like Valverde come close, but as far as I am concerned Nibali is the greatest GT rider of this generation and I sincerely hope he bags another couple of Monuments and a RRWC rainbow jersey to cement that.
richo36 said:King Boonen said:Jspear said:So Nibbes has one monument win and know he's the greatest. So is one monument worth 4 gt's in your opinion?
This is where it gets interesting, because it comes down to discussion. Like with Valverde Vs. Boonen. That one Vuelta doesn't put him above Boonen for me, he'd need probably another two Vueltas or a Giro or Tour in terms of GTs. If he won the WCRR or LBL then it gets very close, he'd probably just nick it but that depends on if Boonen can fire in the cobbled classics one last time. Kelly is better than both.
There are two active GT riders who have won all three GTs which puts them head and shoulders above the rest. Only 6 people in the entire history of racing have managed that. Not Coppi, Indurain, Bobet, Bartali, Gimondi, Pantani, Fignon etc. Some of the greatest GT riders to ever throw a leg over the bike.
As far as I'm concerned, what makes a better GT rider, in my opinion, is one who can put himself on possibly the most elite list in cycling and go out and win monuments. That's my opinion, people can disagree as much as they want but they won't change it.
I think you need to clarify more what you are saying.
Judging GT riders based on there performances in monuments is crazy. It would be like judging PR riders based on how they go in the king of the mountain tour.
So if you are asking who is the best GT rider in GT, you should only consider GT results. In this case contador is the best.
However if you are asking who is overall the best rider out of GT contenders then you can include monuments and other races. In which case nibali is the best.
The second is what I know you mean but they way some of your posts read is that because nibali has won a monument he should be the top favourite for any GT.
Hi. I have pointed out several times that I am grouping him with other GT riders because that is who you would naturally compare him to. I have also pointed out that I am judging him on his whole palmares compared to others whole palmares, that is what matters to me. I have not in any way said Nibali should be top favourite in ANY race, if that's what you read into my posts then I'm sorry.
As a more general point I'll refer to Rollthedice:
Rollthedice said:You argued about King Boonen's opinions which he repeatedly said that they are, obviously, his own. He explained what the criteria is on which he bases his opinion in ranking riders. Then some trols jumped in and everything went downhill with Contador magically appearing again in a discussion about Nibali.
It seems that at times you can't be a fan of another GT rider on this forum unless you couch everything in "but so and so is better at this and that" kind of language. Well no. This is the Nibali thread and yet every time someone wants to say how much they enjoy his riding, like it when he wins etc. someone has to come in and bring up Mr. Boring. I don't agree with them. I don't think Mr. Boring is half the rider Nibali is and I see Nibali as a true cyclist who can challenge on everything but a pan flat course and even then I wouldn't put it past him. Guys like Valverde come close, but as far as I am concerned Nibali is the greatest GT rider of this generation and I sincerely hope he bags another couple of Monuments and a RRWC rainbow jersey to cement that.