Wilba60 said:For those who followed the Greenedge thread on this forum through November and December you will remember the MANY forum contributors who absolutely caned the GE team and their selection of "all sprinters" and no-one who could climb more than a tiny hill. Shocking, weakest in the WT, who picked this rubbish, etc were many of the claims.
As one of the few sticking up for the new Aussie team I am just sitting back smiling. Surely they must be moved from Shocking to Poor now on some of the experts rankings
GE supporters like myself will not be getting ahead of ourselves of course as this trend can't continue all year but it is nice to pick up the wins and we look forward to a few more hopefully...maybe Albasini can go on and win this race to add to Gerrans MSR victory.
One of the beauties of this team and I notice it a lot while you are all discussing the big names is that a lot more riders are given license at GE to go for a win rather than 95% of a team roster looking after 2 or 3 gun riders.
What rubbish. Greenedge ARE a sprinters team. Gerrans' form has been suprising but he isnt a climber and will disappear after Flanders (maybe a stage at the Tour) and Albasini hasnt really been surprising because he has always been a strong rider but if he wins this race it will be a ****up by teams letting him go, not that he is the best.
Do you honestly believe that they are worthy of 3 GT invites? The only WT teams who are weaker are Saxo (for obvious reasons) and Euskaltel (simply because their lack of cobble riders). Greenedge have picked up some very nice results but nothing has changed. Their strong riders are showing good form (apart from Goss), but their weak riders are still very poor.
I expect Weening to rip it up at all three GTs now