Any other rider would do his best to defend this, especially with his skillset. But De Gendt is such a "f*ck it" kind of guy, if he doesn't feel like it, he's not going to.DNP-Old said:I'm not sure if giving De Gendt 3:30 is a good move.
That’s what makes him dangerous too. He’s so unpredictable. He could finish dead last on Valter 2000, he could just as well lose no more than 30 seconds.Logic-is-your-friend said:Any other rider would do his best to defend this, especially with his skillset. But De Gendt is such a "f*ck it" kind of guy, if he doesn't feel like it, he's not going to.DNP-Old said:I'm not sure if giving De Gendt 3:30 is a good move.
I don’t think it will matter. One or two teams will ensure the pace on Vallter 2000 is very high and that will be it.DNP-Old said:I'm not sure if giving De Gendt 3:30 is a good move.
Alexandre B. said:I don’t think it will matter. One or two teams will ensure the pace on Vallter 2000 is very high and that will be it.DNP-Old said:I'm not sure if giving De Gendt 3:30 is a good move.
TourOfSardinia said:I think Sky didn't pull because dawg was hanging off the back
TourOfSardinia said:I think Sky didn't pull because dawg was hanging off the back
You're obviously forgetting some of the ways Valverde has won this race in the past.wheresmybrakes said:That's a, screw you Valverde, it you want to win this race, you gonna have do more than win an uphill sprint. lmao
Yes, they are lucky De Gendt can't climb.Valv.Piti said:Im not worried about De Gendt at all. There's two relatively big mountan stages that should be more than enough. Its not just some unipuerto stages, even though the gradients arent overly high.
ScarponiLogic-is-your-friend said:Yes, they are lucky De Gendt can't climb.Valv.Piti said:Im not worried about De Gendt at all. There's two relatively big mountan stages that should be more than enough. Its not just some unipuerto stages, even though the gradients arent overly high.