Everyone has it all wrong. Pogacar said he wants to be the greatest of all time now so he needs to fill up the record books and set the record for 2nd places as well as wins, and he’s got a lot of catching up to do on WVA.
View: https://twitter.com/ammattipyoraily/status/1769770982846136707
If Pogacar does Vallter 2000 in more than 29 minutes, it will be like a defeat.
If the guy on the couch says it’s a defeat, then defeat it is.It's not easy to beat such a record by over a minute considering the names that participated in the past. 29 minutes would mean 1775 m/h of VAM on a 7.6% climb (circa 6.4 w/kg). Normally it's plausible but this elevation can hamper performance by like 0.2 w/kg compared to a climb 1000 m lower. My guess is around 29'30''.
So Ciccone with the record!View: https://twitter.com/ammattipyoraily/status/1769770982846136707
If Pogacar does Vallter 2000 in more than 29 minutes, it will be like a defeat.
And could have been worse without the Higuita leadout!They did what they had to do, deliver Pogacar to the final hill in the first 10 riders. Pogacar playing games trying to get Jumbo to close it for him is insane considering he could have just blasted off and never lost.
If the elevation continues to hamper the performance of Pogacar, it's bad news for the Tour. If he can't do 6.4 w/kg in this conditions....It's not easy to beat such a record by over a minute considering the names that participated in the past. 29 minutes would mean 1775 m/h of VAM on a 7.6% climb (circa 6.4 w/kg). Normally it's plausible but this elevation can hamper performance by like 0.2 w/kg compared to a climb 1000 m lower. My guess is around 29'30''.
If the elevation continue to hamper the performance of Pogacar, it's bad news for the Tour.
The names on the list didn't race it very aggressively. Vallter had small gaps last year because the pace didn't go up until near the top. Chaves made a long range attack and was only caught around 1km to go or something.
That's why he has an advantage to everyone in altitude, looking at his perfomances, because he almost doesn't lose power. The head perfomance of Visma Heijboer talked in a interview about that advantage by him, he responds well to altitude.It hampers everyone, there's no way around less oxygen in an engine. Unless your beloved Skeletor has an alternate drive installed.
He can still win 5 stages, no problem.Oh well, a lost opportunity. I guess thats 3 stages then and around 2 minutes in GC?
Tourmalet from Gripp (top with 47 km to go in the Tour last year) has similar altitude, but is a bit longer. Tourmalet (2115 m), last 12.37 km at 8.83 %, Vingegaard and Pogi: 36'54", VAM: 1775 m/h, 6.16 W/kg [Dr.F].I get it but can you name anyone who in recent years did 6.4 w/kg for half an hour on a climb above 2000 meters? I don't recall anything like that. I mean, it's possible if Pog has improved indeed and attacks early but it's not a given.
Vingegaard did 6.2 w/kg in the last 33 minutes of La loze, and the conditions of that perfomance were worse than the conditions of tomorrow, it's a unipuerto stage.Tourmalet from Gripp (top with 47 km to go in the Tour last year) has similar altitude, but is a bit longer. Tourmalet (2115 m), last 12.37 km at 8.83 %, Vingegaard and Pogi: 36'54", VAM: 1775 m/h, 6.16 W/kg [Dr.F].
If it rains tomorrow, they won't go sub-30'. ~29'30" should be doable in good conditions.
I had him winning stages 2, 3, 6, and 7 before the start.Oh well, a lost opportunity. I guess thats 3 stages then and around 2 minutes in GC?
Not directly, but plenty of indicators to me that it's easily possible on easy stage.
Small question – in cases like these, where some people obviously gap others, doesn't it not make more sense to use 3km rule re peloton rather than the winning group? Especially when the split was in no way caused by the crash.Was there 3km rule cause otherwise this race really is over.
Afaik, the 3 seconds-rule was also in effect, so there was no real gap in the front.Small question – in cases like these, where some people obviously gap others, doesn't it not make more sense to use 3km rule re peloton rather than the winning group? Especially when the split was in no way caused by the crash.
Small question – in cases like these, where some people obviously gap others, doesn't it not make more sense to use 3km rule re peloton rather than the winning group? Especially when the split was in no way caused by the crash.
7.2 STAGES EXPECTED TO FINISH IN BUNCH SPRINT The following stages have been identified as « expected to finish in bunch sprint »:- Stage 1, 4 and 5 During these stages, the protocol of calculation of time gaps for stages “expected to finish in bunch sprints” published on the UCI website in the Regulations section will be applied.