Volta Ciclista a Catalunya 2024 (March 18-24)

Page 14 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 7, 2013
8,140
14,992
23,180

It's not easy to beat such a record by over a minute considering the names that participated in the past. 29 minutes would mean 1775 m/h of VAM on a 7.6% climb (circa 6.4 w/kg). Normally it's plausible but this elevation can hamper performance by like 0.2 w/kg compared to a climb 1000 m lower. My guess is around 29'30''.
 
Apr 14, 2021
1,598
3,010
10,180
It's not easy to beat such a record by over a minute considering the names that participated in the past. 29 minutes would mean 1775 m/h of VAM on a 7.6% climb (circa 6.4 w/kg). Normally it's plausible but this elevation can hamper performance by like 0.2 w/kg compared to a climb 1000 m lower. My guess is around 29'30''.
If the guy on the couch says it’s a defeat, then defeat it is.
 

CyclistAbi

BANNED
May 29, 2019
11,210
11,702
23,180
The spirit has long left Nick Schultz, his body only moving forward due to inertia. Pogi took mercy today and decided he won't go after win at every stage at Catalunya and Giro.

Pogi but on why?
 
It's not easy to beat such a record by over a minute considering the names that participated in the past. 29 minutes would mean 1775 m/h of VAM on a 7.6% climb (circa 6.4 w/kg). Normally it's plausible but this elevation can hamper performance by like 0.2 w/kg compared to a climb 1000 m lower. My guess is around 29'30''.
If the elevation continues to hamper the performance of Pogacar, it's bad news for the Tour. If he can't do 6.4 w/kg in this conditions....
 
Jul 7, 2013
8,140
14,992
23,180
The names on the list didn't race it very aggressively. Vallter had small gaps last year because the pace didn't go up until near the top. Chaves made a long range attack and was only caught around 1km to go or something.

I get it but can you name anyone who in recent years did 6.4 w/kg for half an hour on a climb above 2000 meters? I don't recall anything like that. I mean, it's possible if Pog has improved indeed and attacks early but it's not a given.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
It hampers everyone, there's no way around less oxygen in an engine. Unless your beloved Skeletor has an alternate drive installed.
That's why he has an advantage to everyone in altitude, looking at his perfomances, because he almost doesn't lose power. The head perfomance of Visma Heijboer talked in a interview about that advantage by him, he responds well to altitude.

Pogacar already said he suffers a bit more in altitude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Apr 30, 2011
47,181
29,829
28,180
I get it but can you name anyone who in recent years did 6.4 w/kg for half an hour on a climb above 2000 meters? I don't recall anything like that. I mean, it's possible if Pog has improved indeed and attacks early but it's not a given.
Tourmalet from Gripp (top with 47 km to go in the Tour last year) has similar altitude, but is a bit longer. Tourmalet (2115 m), last 12.37 km at 8.83 %, Vingegaard and Pogi: 36'54", VAM: 1775 m/h, 6.16 W/kg [Dr.F].

If it rains tomorrow, they won't go sub-30'. ~29'30" should be doable in good conditions.
 
Tourmalet from Gripp (top with 47 km to go in the Tour last year) has similar altitude, but is a bit longer. Tourmalet (2115 m), last 12.37 km at 8.83 %, Vingegaard and Pogi: 36'54", VAM: 1775 m/h, 6.16 W/kg [Dr.F].

If it rains tomorrow, they won't go sub-30'. ~29'30" should be doable in good conditions.
Vingegaard did 6.2 w/kg in the last 33 minutes of La loze, and the conditions of that perfomance were worse than the conditions of tomorrow, it's a unipuerto stage.
La loze was more long, after 16 days and a hard TT, high altitude than Vallter 2000 (2350 m, Vallter 2150), and the stage was more harder.

I don't think 6.4 w/kg is difficult to achieve.
 
Jul 7, 2013
8,140
14,992
23,180
Not directly, but plenty of indicators to me that it's easily possible on easy stage.

Ok, I admit that freshness of riders (start of the race, not too difficult stage) is a factor that can help Pog clock 29 minutes. Last year they did some ridiculous VAM here in Catalunya on an easy stage ending with a low elevation climb.
 
Mar 31, 2015
10,192
4,951
28,180
Was there 3km rule cause otherwise this race really is over.
Small question – in cases like these, where some people obviously gap others, doesn't it not make more sense to use 3km rule re peloton rather than the winning group? Especially when the split was in no way caused by the crash.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,181
29,829
28,180
Small question – in cases like these, where some people obviously gap others, doesn't it not make more sense to use 3km rule re peloton rather than the winning group? Especially when the split was in no way caused by the crash.
Afaik, the 3 seconds-rule was also in effect, so there was no real gap in the front.
 
Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
Small question – in cases like these, where some people obviously gap others, doesn't it not make more sense to use 3km rule re peloton rather than the winning group? Especially when the split was in no way caused by the crash.

If you mean people getting the time of Schultz despite there being a gap, it was because of a sprinter stage protocol being applied.

Which is I think is a bit iffy for a stage ending uphill, but maybe it was also because of the run-in.

Edit:

7.2 STAGES EXPECTED TO FINISH IN BUNCH SPRINT The following stages have been identified as « expected to finish in bunch sprint »:- Stage 1, 4 and 5 During these stages, the protocol of calculation of time gaps for stages “expected to finish in bunch sprints” published on the UCI website in the Regulations section will be applied.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Brullnux
Mar 31, 2015
10,192
4,951
28,180
Yeah also meant in the case of a sprint stage, and someone attacks 1.5km out and wins by 5s, it feels wrong that they are then put s/t by an unconnected crash in the peloton that had no bearing on their win or gap.

So would I be right in saying in the hypothetical situation, the winner wouldn't be s/t because of the 3s gap rule?