The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
jilbiker said:seems to be no concern that AV took 17 seconds on AC? That seems like a chunk of time
3 + 3 + 12 = 18 sec. You never know.roundabout said:He took 3 seconds on the road.
cineteq said:3 + 3 + 12 = 18 sec. You never know.
Descender said:How many did he get for the intermidiate sprint again?
He he, right he was 2nd. In my mind he won. so it was 6 sec. for that intermediate sprint?Netserk said:!
3+6+8=17
LaFlorecita said:It is. But is it important? No.
LaFlorecita said:3 + 6 + 8
Netserk said:!
3+6+8=17
Descender said:How many did he get for the intermidiate sprint again?
EDIT: That's what I thought. 6 at the sprint, 3 real and 8 bonus at the finish.
jilbiker said:I guess its make or break tomorrow. AV looks really strong (See Tyler's book...chuckle), I think that he is the one for AC to watch tomorrow.
djlovesyou said:I think Katusha have been reading this forum and realised the most important thing about this race is not winning, but giving the evil scourge that is Team SKY and Chris Froome as big a beating as possible.
They'll ride for Moreno now.
c&cfan said:thank god sagan is resting, otherwise the kid would've won 10 stages already.. and valverde is getting great again
valverde will beat phil at the worlds, it will be a great victory for fair and clean cycling.
c&cfan said:thank god sagan is resting, otherwise the kid would've won 10 stages already.. and valverde is getting great again
valverde will beat phil at the worlds, it will be a great victory for fair and clean cycling.
jilbiker said:I guess its make or break tomorrow. AV looks really strong (See Tyler's book...chuckle), I think that he is the one for AC to watch tomorrow.
Bernie's eyesore said:I enjoyed it.