Christian Prudhomme is the Tour de France director, he has nothing to do with the Vuelta organization.
Absolutely!why would they make changes, because posters on the cyclingnews forums don't like the routes?
Because it would make their race better. Which is presumably something they want.why would they make changes, because posters on the cyclingnews forums don't like the routes?
I think someone who has enough time should re-design the route with the same start and finish locations. Maybe I may have a go at it in a few days.
I think I may like the first one you posted most, this as the last 80 km or so (may even allow moves on Fonte da Cova) (may even do entirety of this for a 230+ km stage)
![]()
Trobaniello may also be a possibility but not sure if Vuelta wants it. And yes, new side of Farrapona is a very good option too.
The only 1st cat passes are: Toses, Canto, Brenes, Mozqueta, Cordal, A Garganta, Alto da Groba, Navacerrada and some of them are definitely not deserving of cat.1 and or/are plain useless.
The only 1st cat passes are: Toses, Canto, Brenes, Mozqueta, Cordal, A Garganta, Alto da Groba, Navacerrada and some of them are definitely not deserving of cat.1 and or/are plain useless.
In modern times. which for the Vuelta I consider post-2009 which marked a step ahead in terms of route design, this might really be the weakest Vuelta in terms of mountain passes. Might be the weakest Vuelta route overall since then.
Yeah forgot to write that. And I agree (and it may even be ESP, in terms of hardness).San Lorenzo too, the hardest of all and the best-placed one.
A different way to phrase it: Which GT route do you think has been clearly worse than this one?I will follow it too.
Thank you to @Devil's Elbow for his stage by stage opinion which I will use to judge.
Stage 2 is an easy MTF but it is steepest in the final kilometers and it will reveal any GC contenders not capable of being competitive by Madrid.
Stages 6 and 7 in Andorra could be harder than they look. @Devil's Elbow describes these as "Middling unipuerto(ish) MTFs". I'm glad we added "ish" as there are some decent lumps in the middle of those stages and at altitude.
The TTT on stage 5 is meh and what is so bad about Bola del Mundo on stage 20? Stage 20 incidently might be the queen stage you are looking for except its a bit short.
There is no a full opening week of sprinters stages like the Tours of yesteryear. It could be much worse.
Its the Vuelta well known for unipuerto MTFs and it will likely be hot. So I am surprised to read all this whinging and negative hyperbole from seasoned posters. I get that there isn't a clear Queen stage but it will still be an interesting race. Its the riders that make a race not the route and we usually find something to complain about in any route.
My $0.02.
Youngsters.Do you recognize these friendly faces?
![]()
Of all the Grand Tour routes I have seen, I can say that this is one of them.
Maybe they were thinking of that ttt they did in the dark a few years back, which was of course an instant classic.Thought of you when I read the cycling news article on the route and their description of the team time trial as a "firm fan favourite".
And the 26 km individual time trial as "long". Unfortunately I'm not kidding.
2012 Tour. How about you guys spell out why this Vuelta route is so bad? I am sure this Vuelta isn’t great but as I said the riders usually determine how exciting grand tours end up.A different way to phrase it: Which GT route do you think has been clearly worse than this one?
Maybe all routes are fantastic, and this is merely the least fantastic one, but it's still rather telling if it's the worst one in recent years, no?
Very hard to attack before the super-steep final 3 kilometres, so very little opportunity to roll the dice. If the red jersey has even a minute going into that stage, he is as good as safe.what is so bad about Bola del Mundo on stage 20?
I have no problem people complaining but at least explain yourselves? Okay so it’s the worst one in recent years - why?