Vuelta a España Vuelta 2026 route rumours

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I climbed both Zoncolan and Crostis. Crostis is a beauty, Zoncolan a beast. If you find your rithm then Crostis is quite ok as the slopes are constant.
Offtopic, for me personal Joux Plane was harder than both of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sciatic
Wonder if they simply follow the coast or if they put themselves in a weird position of having to make a long transfer again. With the race reportedly finishing on the Canary Islands you'd assume they'd want to avoid an unnecessarily long transfer early on in the race.
 
Wonder if they simply follow the coast or if they put themselves in a weird position of having to make a long transfer again. With the race reportedly finishing on the Canary Islands you'd assume they'd want to avoid an unnecessarily long transfer early on in the race.
They can easily enter either Catalonia or Andorra on stage 4 even with stage 2 also starting in Monaco and short (by Vuelta standards) transfers after stages 2 and 3. Finish someplace like Mont Faron on stage 2 and you have your race start sorted from both a logistical and a sporting perspective.
 
No Teide finish is probably related to restrictions to finish inside the National Park area. As an alternative, they can try at the Observatory, which is outside the National Park and still above 2300m. In any case, I'm not a big fan of those superlong and shallow climbs.

On the other hand... this is one of the most Guillén-style climbs in Tenerife and the area (Masca valley) is overfeatured in Instagram and overcrowded.

CherfeN.gif
 
Perfect. That means Pico de las Nieves should be the last big MTF, which is good because it's really hard but with the parts that make it really hard pretty far from the summit. Then use the best sides of Retamar and Izaña in a remotely competent way in your final weekend and you have a great finish to the race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OlavEH
No Teide finish is probably related to restrictions to finish inside the National Park area. As an alternative, they can try at the Observatory, which is outside the National Park and still above 2300m. In any case, I'm not a big fan of those superlong and shallow climbs.

On the other hand... this is one of the most Guillén-style climbs in Tenerife and the area (Masca valley) is overfeatured in Instagram and overcrowded.

CherfeN.gif
View: https://x.com/cirogazzetta/status/1964053202757894233
 
No Teide finish is probably related to restrictions to finish inside the National Park area. As an alternative, they can try at the Observatory, which is outside the National Park and still above 2300m. In any case, I'm not a big fan of those superlong and shallow climbs.
Izaña via Alto de Los Loros is perfectly fine. At the first Mirador you can turn right instead of left and descend into Santa Cruz.

IzanaSE.gif
 
Would it be possible for all Spanish races to withdraw from the WT?
With the WT calendar already confirmed for next year, presumably only if the UCI acquiesce, and I don't think the UCI will want to devaluate the WT if they can avoid it. And with the heightened importance of UCI points in recent years, it's a far more problematic step for the race organisers (who ultimately are caught in the crossfire here) than it was during the spat around 2008.

Edit: and a three-week race is also over the limit for non-WT races, so for the Vuelta specifically a rule change would be required too.
 
That's Canary's out of the Vuelta then.
At this point, I am not convinced there are 21 stages worth of potentially interested towns/regions that have no problem with hosting a race that features IPT. Even among those that do not support a ban on IPT, I doubt there will be many who are interesting in paying to host a very obvious target for protests.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: yaco