The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
MatParker117 said:Don't think much will happen tomorrow in terms of GC, the run in to the finale is basically flat as a pancake and Froome just needs to magnetize himself to Contador's back wheel. I'll go with Degenkolb after what he did on Hatta Dam.
Rollthedice said:Vuelta 2012, Froome was still nowhere near being a rival. Contador had far more problems with Purito.
Tour 2013, Contador was at Kreuziger level, a rival only on paper for Froome who in fact had no rival.
Last year's Vuelta was the first time when they were proven rivals.
So it is early to speak about a rivalry, it's rather a developing situation.
Taxus4a said:Today it was a long and hard day, more with the wind and rain, and the vbevgining was fast during 50 kms, and it is a second day of effort. That is better for Froome.
Big % slopes is not the best for him, but today was an ally, becouse that way is easier to drop anybody.
The team did very well today, not as yesterday, and they could use Nieve.
Tomorrow there is still fight for GC.
Great spectacle.
Taxus4a said:Today it was a long and hard day, more with the wind and rain, and the vbevgining was fast during 50 kms, and it is a second day of effort. That is better for Froome.
Big % slopes is not the best for him, but today was an ally, becouse that way is easier to drop anybody.
The team did very well today, not as yesterday, and they could use Nieve.
Tomorrow there is still fight for GC.
Great spectacle.
Publicus said:You are FOREVER making excuses. A 16.7KM climb isn't long enough for Froome to be competitive??? Lol...:rolleyes
EDIT: I do love the grasping of straws to put lipstick on this pig for Froome. On similar form, Contador has demonstrated he's better (Vuelta 2014 and now this race). No qualifiers/explanations are needed IMO.
Tournesol said:They are rivals,of that there is no doubt but you asserted it was comparably as great a rivalry as Coppi/Bartali.Not true.Great rivalries in cycling are for me probably Coppi/Bartali,Merckx/DeVlaeminck,Anquetil/Poulidor.
The Froome/AC rivalry has a ways to go before it can be discussed in the same breath as the above.
Bexon30 said:Missed today's stage but it sounds like Froome battered everyone. Any kind person share a video clip link of the last climb please.
Arredondo said:I'm saying that, if this is going to continue for some years, it will be judged as a great rivalry like we had in the 50's/60's/70's, or whatever time you pick. Because history will place a rivalry like this in it's right perspective.
Tournesol said:Its not going to continue for some years though,AC is retiring next year so for that reason it will never attain the legendary status of the rivalries i mentioned.
Its a rivalry of a time like AC/Lance and AC/Andy were,not particularly special IMO.
Arredondo said:You really believe that?
AC-Andy was not a rivalry at all. There only faced each other in the Tour, in all the other races Schleck was horrible or Contador didn't rode for the win.
Froome and Contador fight each other in every race they encounter. That's way different.
Tournesol said:That was my point,if we accept Le Tour is the most important race then they've only faced off properly once just like AC/Lance AC/Andy.You can believe its a great rivalry if you want.