- Sep 8, 2010
- 1,441
- 0
- 0
jsem94 said:There's no way Martin will be able to top 10 this after the tour - and if he has any ambitions and lay good in GC, he'll crack BIG TIME on the Angliru and lose 10+ minutes.
He is in contention for the TT win together with the likes of Menchov.
The Hitch said:Does he say he wants to top 10?
This isnt the Tour de France, hence Martin likely sees this at best as as a warm up for the Worlds with an opportunity to win a tt.
Also I think the tt comes too early for Menchov.
icefire said:Menchov crushed the field in 2007 in the ITT on stage 10. This year the ITT is...
on stage 10![]()
The Hitch said:Yes but hes not going to beat Martin on stage 10. He has a better chance of doing that if its stage 18 and recovery is a much bigger factor.
Besides the only tt i choose to remember from Vuelta 07 is the last one![]()
Bavarianrider said:I hope HTC won't have Eisel thereSpoilng the TTT once is enough
![]()
Bavarianrider said:I think it sucks the TT comes right after the mountain stages. They should have made the rest day on Monday and the TT on Tuesday!
At least its 47km now.
After finishing outside the time limit on both of them, so for him they were probably like 2 rest days.icefire said:The TT doesn't come after but in between mountain stages. The rest day after instead of before the TT is dictated by the transfer distances.
None of this should be an excuse for the TT beasts. Martin won the TdF TT after 2 mountain stages with no rest day.
maltiv said:After finishing outside the time limit on both of them, so for him they were probably like 2 rest days.
icefire said:Menchov crushed the field in 2007 in the ITT on stage 10. This year the ITT is...
on stage 10![]()
l.Harm said:If Schleck rides Giro and Vuelta he probably wins both(yes except when Contador rides Vuelta).
Andy Schleck isn't much better than Menchov. Cadel Evans beat him this year, and GT-wise he's pretty much the same type of rider. On more or less the same level.l.Harm said:I think ur talking nonsense.
Before Menchov won a GT nobody thought he could win it and Schleck is much better than him (except time trial). Especially in the Giro and Vuelta where are more climbs than in TdF Schleck has a lot more chance to win it. You're talking about 'something special', very vague imo. Evans had to change to become a champion, Schleck doesn't need to change, he only has to train his f.ckin time trial to beat Evans and especially Contador in the future.
Speaking of "nonsense" If, as you said, He does not need to change, why are you suggesting he needs to train?. Let him continue to be what he is now. He should be satisfied a second place at best once in while, and at the back of the leaders group the rest of the year, no?. That would be consistant with what He has done and no need to change that. It also seems often that Schleck fail to win int the mountains the time he need to make up for his deficits in the ITT. Had be been able to take over 2 minutes on Cadel in the mountains, his ITT performance would not matter. As a climber , Andy lost his 2011 tour by a failing to perform adequately in the mountains, especially in Alpes d'huez and Luz. He does need to change his climbing if he want to win somedayl.Harm said:I think ur talking nonsense.
Before Menchov won a GT nobody thought he could win it and Schleck is much better than him (except time trial). Especially in the Giro and Vuelta where are more climbs than in TdF Schleck has a lot more chance to win it. You're talking about 'something special', very vague imo. Evans had to change to become a champion, Schleck doesn't need to change, he only has to train his f.ckin time trial to beat Evans and especially Contador in the future.
theyoungest said:Andy Schleck isn't much better than Menchov. Cadel Evans beat him this year, and GT-wise he's pretty much the same type of rider. On more or less the same level.
Last year Andy was definitely stronger than Menchov, but this year... I doubt it. That's why it's too bad Menchov wasn't invited in favour of the great Jerome Coppel.
