auscyclefan94 said:
Tour was quite interesting racing across 3 weeks. Many would agree that it was unpredictable and exciting.
Giro was just such a one sided affair that I didn't really care for the race in the end. This Vuelta has all the big gc riders not doing that great. A lot of 2nd tier riders are doing well here. NO disrespect to Froome, Kessiakoff, Mollema, Fuglsang, etc but they all being in the top 10 and some in the top 5 of a GT is a bit comedic.
Froome definitely; Kessiakoff, Mollema and Fuglsang are people that pre-race I wouldn't be surprised to see in the top 10, but would expect at the lower end of it. Froome is the only
real shock, and he continues to confound and amaze.
Scirea said:
The TdF wasn't interesting at all. If not for Bertie's kamikaze attack it would have been total boredom... I know you were excited because Evans but it doesn't mean the race was great.
auscyclefan94 said:
It was unpredicatable and exciting. Everybody after the race on this forum were raving about what a entertaining race it was.
So your argument is that everybody on the forum were raving about how great it was... as a response to somebody on the forum talking about it being dull?
Scirea said:
Kopuliak said:
I agree with Scirea.Two 'boring' weeks from top GC riders in defensive mode and waiting for some Alps show-down stage and/or ITT ...
Case closed. Not everybody thought it was entertaining. The GC battle was an embarrassment. When after two weeks Philippe Gilbert is in the top 10 without any big breakaways and without having put in a ride-of-your-life on the only climb to date like Voeckler did, you know that your race is not hard enough. And then they went and put a pan-flat stage on the penultimate weekend after 2 weeks of absolutely nothing happening other than crashing! The Tour started with the stage into Gap, and ended with the ITT. It was a 5 stage race. Not really becoming of the biggest race on the calendar. We've had 2 GTs this year. The Giro was one-sided and the Vuelta has been a tale of the big contenders having poor form and the few who are able to follow preserving what they've got.
The Hitch said:
The last couple of days in Poland were very exciting - but the first few were a typical yawn with the usual city circuit sprint finishes.
jens_attacks said:
what's the weather like in the area?i've heard is raining like hell?
The long range forecast said it would rain continuously on the last week of the race, but now it looks like the weather will be mostly pretty decent.
manafana said:
some people on here need stop complaining, they said yesterday would be crap it spilts, then when it spilts they give out about something else.
Enjoy the race guy, appreciate the way wiggins work, if i was better at grinding i wouldnt be attacking. I used to attack in a style that people love but sure id soon be out back if didnt work, however upping the tempo has seen me burn people off, enjoy the excitement of seeing people drop off one by one, enjoy the mayhem and realise the racing is alot better than you think.
I appreciate the way he works - but that doesn't mean we can't long for something less effective but more visually appealing. Should Wiggins be darting off the front and starting a back and forth? No, of course he shouldn't, because slowly grinding people off his wheel one by one is going to be much more effective for him. It's a lot harder to be immediately drawn in by "Wiggins is carrying a group behind him, they are all trying to pokerface it so it just looks like formation riding with occasionally someone dropping off" than "and now Rodríguez goes! He's pulled back by... Van den Broeck, Cobo and Mollema! Wiggins grinding back up to the rear wheel... now someone else goes!". However, Wiggins' pace is too hot for most of them to do anything BUT follow.